Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to another blog entry at this site:
Who makes the determination of what is “honest” .
Under our system, the jury makes the ultimate determination for legal purposes. But you obviously know this without asking me.
Also, please state specific case law that supports your conclusion that banning someone from a website is considered fraud.
There’s lot of caselaw on what constitutes financial fraud. You obviously possess the same ability to research caselaw that I possess.
This is the first case that I know of where a group of Wall Street Con Men and their Internet Goon Squads used board bannings to keep millions of middle-class investors from learning what the peer-reviewed research says. The people on your jury will be people who have lost most of their life savings as a result of your massive con. I feel pretty darn confident re how your case is going to be decided.
But I am not God. I have been wrong before. We will have to wait for the next crash to come to see how long your prison sentence will be.
Fair enough?
Rob
Rob,
Who makes the determination of what is “honest” . Also, please state specific case law that supports your conclusion that banning someone from a website is considered fraud.
feed twitter twitter facebook