I’ve added Podcast #49 to the “RobCasts” section of the site. It’s called The Road Out.
Famed investing strategist Carly Simon summed up the Rational Investor’s take re stock-market gloom and doom when she observed that: “I haven’t got time for the pain, I haven’t the need for the pain.”


Yes, we have cut out half of the randomness in the stock market.
Pull up the Stock Return Predictor. Vary P/E10 over a reasonable range. You can see how much returns vary, including the extremes.
Have fun.
John Walter Russell
I liked this RobCast.
Sure enough, reality will overcome the Passive Investing dogma.
Our readers have done very well.
I have no joy over the ill fortune of those who failed to listen.
Have fun.
John Walter Russell
we have cut out half of the randomness in the stock market.
I’m thinking that it’s better than that. But it may well be that I don’t understand the numbers side of things particularly well. If I am saying this wrong, I hope that you or someone else will set me straight. I want to promote this to the extent it merits promotion, not less than that but also not more than that.
Passive Investing says that stock prices are 100 percent unpredictable. It’s all random. The data says that prices are 78 percent predictable at Year 20. That means that only 22 percent unpredictability remains. If one says that unpredictability is risk (I think that’s fair), then risk has been reduced from 100 percent to 22 percent. Rational Investing is roughly one-fourth as risky as Passive Investing.
Perhaps I am overstating things. I don’t at all want people to hold back from saying so if their take is that I am. The benefit of community is that we get to hear all sorts of perspectives and to learn from the interactions. I am an effusive fellow by nature. I am enthusiastic re the Rational Investing model. So I need people to help me out by pulling me in a bit when appropriate.
It’s a big deal. Stocks are much less risky than most people realize today. I am highly confident of that much.
Rob
I have no joy over the ill fortune of those who failed to listen.
Indeed! We better not experience joy over their misfortunes. We are all in this together. Their misfortunes are our misfortunes.
There are serious people talking about the possibility of the U.S. economy going into a depression. Depressions often lead to wars. The Passive Investing concept has already caused more human misery than any other idea in the history of personal finance and it is threatening to cause a whole big bunch more in days to come.
Taylor Larimore is in pain today. He is talking about going to a zero stock allocation. It’s the same with Bill Bengen. These are not the only two who are finding these panicky thoughts going through their heads as a result of the misplaced confidence they once put in the Passive Investing model. We are going to see a whole big bunch more of this in days to come if responsible people do not step forward and take responsible steps. People are going to be making panicky decisions that are going to lock in huge losses and all of us are going to suffer for many years to come as a consequence of the damage these horrible financial choices do to the economy as a whole.
We want people to come to a better understanding of the realities. We need to be as firm as possible on the point of permitting those who understand the realities to talk about them. We obviously cannot learn the realities for so long as the realities may not be spoken in any room in which a frightened Passive Investing enthusiast has taken up residence (that’s just about all the rooms that there are in InvestoWorld). We also need to be as flexible and loving as we can on all other points. We need to do all that we possibly can do without sacrificing our personal integrity to help those who have advocated or followed the Passive Investing approach to come to terms with the mistakes they have made and the harm they have done to themselves and others by making those mistakes.
The idea is to stop the car from going over the cliff. We must grab the steering wheel. The idea of not making a turn when the car is headed over a cliff is pure madness. But we must persuade those now holding the steering wheel of the merit of the idea of giving up control of it. You don’t do that by insulting them or making them feel bad or rubbing their noses in it or whatever.
You never want to say “hey, you’re doing a good job steering this car, keep up the good work!” It’s irresponsible and cowardly statements like that that got us into this mess in the first place. But you want to keep your head. You want to remember that all sorts of smart and good people have fallen for this nonsense. It could have happened to any of us. This is a “there but for the grace of God” sort of situation, not a situation that calls for retribution. Bringing a spirit of retribution to this could well cause the car to go over the cliff. Then we all die, Passives and Rationals both.
This has got to be a community effort. It cannot bear good fruit if approached n any other way, in my assessment.
Rob
we have cut out half of the randomness in the stock market.
I’m thinking that it’s better than that.
You are right.
Try various values of P/E10 and compare the Year 10 results.
Have fun.
John Walter Russell
John:
After reading your comments, I went back and listened to the podcast again. I of course discovered that the idea that looking at the historical data cuts the risk of stock investing in half is my own estimate!
What happened is that, after saying that on this podcast, I began to wonder if the reduction in risk could be better quantified. I have a podcast on the drawing board in which I will try to argue that we have reduced the risk of stock investing by not one half but by three quarters.
All of these estimates are obviously tentative. But my thought today (it’s nearly two months since the podcast posted today was recorded) is that the reality is better than I described it to be at the earlier time.
Rob