I’ve posted Podcast #66 to the “RobCasts” section of the site. It’s called Bogle on Minsky — We Have Met the Market and It Is Us.
There is no sense getting angry at “the market.” We are the market. Why did we fall for all that Passive Investing gibberish again?


There is no sense getting angry at “the market.” We are the market. Why did we fall for all that Passive Investing gibberish again?
And yet some people think we can beat the market.
We ARE the market, Evidence.
We beat the market by beating ourselves. That is, we beat the market by learning, by improving, by admitting old mistakes and moving forward to something better.
I’d be grateful if you would take a look at this thread from the Goon Central board:
http://www.s152957355.onlinehome.us/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1234789709
Pay no attention to what Rob Bennett says about how to beat the market. Read what Drip Guy (a big Passive Investing apologist) has to say about it. He’s telling you how to beat the market in the words of his that I quote in that thread.
Drip Guy is not biased against Passive Investing, Evidence. But for the length of time that it took him to write that post he “got it.”
Now he probably forgets. Now he probably denies knowing how to beat the market.
Read those words by Drip Guy and think them over and you will see how it is possible (even easy!) to beat the market. We are the market. So beating the market means beating ourselves. Beating the market means wising up. Beating the market means no longer doing what makes no sense and shifting to what does make sense.
Can you imagine what sort of world we would live in if people took this “you can’t beat the market” concept and applied it in other areas of life endeavor? No one would have ever invented the wheel because everyone would have told anyone who tried that “you can’t improve the world.” No one would have invented electricity because everyone would have told anyone who tried that ” you can’t improve the world.”
We beat the market by beating our old selves and becoming more effective and better informed investors. Another phrase for it is “Learning Together.”
I’m for it.
Rob
Remember that different market participants have different objectives. Most mutual fund managers try to increase assets under management. They look for short term success. Even if they wanted to invest properly, they would not be around long enough if they sought higher returns only over the long term.
The individual has the advantage. He can invest without being overly concerned with year to year results.
Have fun.
John Walter Russell
Even if they wanted to invest properly, they would not be around long enough if they sought higher returns only over the long term.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, John. You make an outstanding point, in my view.
I don’t think that this need necessarily be so in the future, however. The academic research has been showing for close to 30 years now that valuations affect long-term returns. What if the “experts” were to publicize these findings? What if those who have advocated Passive Investing were to acknowledge the mistake? What if Money magazine were to run a series of cover articles pointing out the benefits of Valuation-Informed Indexing over the conventional indexing approach?
That changes everything, no?
I just don’t want people to get too caught up in the doom and gloom. Yes, the Passive Investing Era has been a horrible failure. Sometimes it is the greatest failures that lead to the biggest changes that lead to the biggest successes. I see a silver lining in the exceedingly dark cloud passing over us today.
Rob
Drip Guys quote now that I think about it, actually perversely, the less people believe in EMT the truer it likely is, and the more people believe in it, the more mispricing becomes likely, IMHO.
It does not matter whether everyone believes EMT or no-one believes it, it does not affect whether we can beat the market. We are the market. If over a certain period of time the market returns for example 8% then that is the most that “we (the market)” can get.
Trying to redefine what “beating the market” means does not increase investor returns.
I’m grateful to you for taking the time to consider the question and to craft a response, Evidence. It helps all of us for you to be willing to go to the trouble to present the other side of the story.
Rob