I’ve added Podcast #97 to the “RobCasts” section of the site. It’s called It’s Not William Bernstein vs. Rob Bennett, It’s William Bernstein vs. William Bernstein.
I’m not smarter than the experts. My “genius” lies in combining things that different experts have said that make sense while rejecting the dumb stuff. This is done all the time in other fields of life endeavor. It amazes me that many view it as a “controversial” approach in the investing field.


Another advantage that you possess is that you seek consistency. William Bernstein is especially bad about that point.
Have fun.
John Walter Russell
William Bernstein is especially bad about that point.
Is that so in general or is that so only when Bill is trying to “defend” some point that he feels obligated to defend because he advocates the Passive Investing model?
My guess is that it is the later. My experience has been that believing in Passive Investing makes all sorts of very smart people appear to be dumb as a bag of rocks for the length of time it takes them to “defend” the dominant model for understanding how stock investing works.
I believe that Bernstein is very much capable of intellectual integrity. I don’t believe that it is possible for Bernstein or anyone else to put forward an argument of intellectual integrity in support of the Passive Investing model.
My point is that the problem is not Bill Bernstein. The problem is the model that he is trying to defend. No one is capable of engaging in the intellectual gymnastics it would take to defend that model successfully without employing intellectual inconsistencies to do so.
Passive Investing has become The Theory That Cannot Be Quetioned.
The reason why it has become The Theory That Cannot Be Questioned is that it has long been The Theory That Cannot Be Defended Effectively.
Rob
William Bernstein is inconsistent throughout “The Four Pillars of Investing.” Many people find the book hard to read. BUT as soon as you recognize that his numbers differ from place to place (i.e., numbers that are supposed to be the same), it becomes an easy read. Think in terms of plausibility arguments as opposed to logical proofs.
OTOH, William Bernstein is very honest in what I have seen of his internet postings.
Have fun.
John Walter Russell
You are much too modest about your own contribution and the creation of Valuation Informed Indexing. I still retain the Lucky 7 Archives button at my web site. It brings investors right back to this site.
Have fun.
John Walter Russell
Give yourself credit.
I never even considered the idea of making calculators before you asked for them. Now they are the most popular feature at my site.
As an engineer, I had been satisfied with generating equations. Now we have some great tools.
It never occurred to me how useful the Scenario Surfer would be until we built it. Then applications just started popping up all over the place.
You asked the right questions. You focused on investor needs.
Have fun.
John Walter Russell
Thank you for your kind words, John.
It’s not my goal to be falsely modest (that wouldn’t be a great way to go about promoting my site and my book, would it?). And it’s not my goal to brag about things that are not really my doing (false pride always leads to a popping of the balloon in my experience). I think it’s best if people just look at the record and at the work product and draw their own conclusions.
I certainly don’t think that anything I’ve contributed required any great intellect to put forward. I have followed a path, working as best as I could from one point to the next to the next to the next. I do believe that the work product is wonderful. It is not my intent to be even a little bit modest about the work product (which I view as the end result of a community effort).
I think there was just a great opportunity here. Things had just been set up in such a way that someone was going to come along and make some exciting things happen. I could not have done it on my own. And perhaps there were not any others who could have done it on their own. It took a combination of skills and the internet permitted us to pull people together that possessed all the necessary skills in a single place. It is the COMBINATION of skill sets that really made this happen, in my assessment.
It’s the internet discussion-board communications medium (a medium with far more potential to do good than most people today recognize) that deserves the primary credit. I think it could be said that I saw the potential of this new medium because of my early involvement and that because of that I was a bit more persistent that some others in trying to lead things in a positive direction. I’m happy to take credit for seeing the huge potential of our community and for very much not wanting to see that potential go to waste.
Please take a bow, Retire Early and Indexing Communities! You’re true genius communities!
Rob