I gave a five-minute Ignite presentation to the 2014 Financial Bloggers Conference (FinCon14) called “How to Predict Stock Returns for Fun and Profit.” Here’s the video:
The Old Ideas on Saving & Investing Don't Work -- Here's What Does
"Valuation-Informed Indexing Is the Same Song We Sing. Glad You Belong to the Same Choir We Do."
"Retirees Now Frequently Base Their Retirement Decisions on the Portfolio Success Rates Found in Research Such as the Trinity Study.... This Is Not the Information They Need for Making Their Withdrawal Rate Decisions."
"The P/E10 Tool Could Drastically Change
How the Entire Investment Industry
Operates and Measures Risk."
"The Your Money or Your Life Book
for a New Generation."
"A Newer School of Thought Believes That the Safe Withdrawal Rate Depends on How Stocks Are Priced at the Time You Begin Making Withdrawals."
"A Fascinating Retirement Calculator."
"The Evidence is Pretty Incontrovertible. Valuation-Informed Indexing...Is Everywhere Superior to Buy-and-Hold Over Ten-Year Periods."
"Every Detail Shows Rob's Respect
for His Information and His Reader."
"You’ve Accomplished Something Radical
With Your Idea of Passion Saving."
"Big Moves Out of Stocks Should Not Be Done at All. But Strategic Asset Allocation Can Be Done At Very Rare Times, Maybe Six Times in an Investor’s Lifetime, Three Times When the Market Is Stupidly High and Three Times When Stupidly Low."
"Valuation-Informed Investing and Passive Investing
Share More of a Common Ancestry
Than It Might Appear at First."
"It Is Great to See a Finance Journalist Who Understands That Valuations Matter. Efficient Market Zealotry Is Rampant in the Journalism Community. I Just Love Your Valuation-Based Return Calculator."
"There Is Always An Unlimited Supply of Complainers Against Any Good Idea."
"Rob: This Has Been One of the Most Insightful and Helpful Comments I Think Anyone Has Ever Posted. Thank You for This Lesson and for Sharing Your Knowledge on This Subject!"
"There Is An Extensive Literature About the Predictability of Long-Term Stock Returns. There Is an Extensive Literature About Short-Term Market Timing. My Question Is About Long-Term Market Timing. The Literature Seems Slim."
"Your Ideas Are Sound."
"For Years, the Investment Industry Has
Tried to Scare Clients Into Staying Fully Invested
in the Stock Market at All Times, No Matter
How High Stocks Go. It's Hooey.
They're Leaving Out More Than Half the Story."
"There Are Time-Periods Where Stocks Are a Terrible Addition to That Portfolio. Yet Inexplicably, We As Planners STILL tend to Suggest That It Is 'Risky' to Not Own Stocks When in Reality the Only Risk Is to Our Business."
"Valuation-Informed Indexing Provides More Wealth for 102 of 110 of the Rolling 30-Year Time-Periods While Buy-and-Hold Did Better in Eight of the Periods."
"There Is a Growing Behavioral Economics Movement, But It So Far Has Had Limited Impact. Economists Are Not Fond of the Softness and Imprecision of Psychology. These Notions Are Considered Vaguely Unprofessional and Flaky."
"I Would Occasionally Get a Response Post
Saying I Was 'the Best Since Rob Bennett
Challenged Us to Think.'"
"This [The Stock-Return Predictor]
Is a Very Handy Little Tool."
"A Much Simpler Way to Bring
the Valuation Issue to Focus."
(Referring to The Stock-Return Predictor)
"It's Informative, It's Based on Solid Data and It Provides Useful Results." (Referring to The Stock-Return Predictor)
"Meet Three Couples Who Left the Corporate World to Do the Kinds of Work That Satisfied Them."
"A Very Solid Approach to Investing."
"Rob Bennett Has Been on a Tear With One Outstanding RobCast After Another."
"It’s Time for a Different Way to Look at Investing, and Rob Is Onto Something Here."
"My Afternoon Train Reading."
(Referring to Rob's Article titled
Why Buy-and-Hold Investing Can Never Work)
"What Is It With Guys Named Rob?
Longtime Index Agitator Rob Arnott Has Now
Been Joined on These Pages by a
Vanguard Diehard Agitator Named Rob Bennett."
"He Offers a Fresh New Perspective
that Will Motivate You to Get on Track
With a Solid Savings Plan."
"While Browsing at www.PassionSaving.com the Other Day, I Discovered an Article Featuring Ten Unconventional Money-Saving Tips. Each of These Offers a New Way to See Money."
"Rob Has Ideas About Investing That Many Bloggers Find 'Interesting.' His Posts Are Often Controversial and Always Thought Provoking."
"Is There a Way to Turn Saving Into Something Fun? If There Was, I Bet a Lot More of Us Would Do a Lot More Saving. I Found a Website Where This Basic Premise Is Explored in Great Depth."
"I Have Much More Confidence in My Ability to Understand What Is Happening....I Thank You for Your Public Service, and, In Another Dimension, for the Personal Courage It Took to Make It Happen."
"I Was Hooked on the Idea of [Passive] Index Indexing, But Something Inside Made Me Wonder "Too Good to Be True?" and "What's the Downside?" I Happened on to Your Site and Valuation-Informed Indexing Seems to Make Sense."
"Reads Like a Casual Conversation
with a Likable Guy Who Wants Nothing More
Than to Help Others Experience the Same Joy
and Happiness He Has Found."
"Your 'Secrets' Are Exactly Like Magic Tricks: Once Revealed, They Look So Simple, Yet You Need Somebody to Show You How It Works."
"Rob's Da Man! Never in the History of the Diehards Forum Has One Poster, Always Making Civil and Well Thought-Out Posts, Managed to Irritate So Many Without Anyone Being Able to Articulate a Good Reason As to Why."
"I’ve Been Surprised at How Controversial This Idea Is, but If Most People Are Buying and Holding, They Are Emotionally Invested in This Strategy."
"The Findings for [Long-Term] Market Timing Are So Robust That It Hardly Matters How We Do It."
"The Elegant Simplicity of His Ideas Throughout Warms the Heart and Startles the Brain."
"Mr. Bennett Evidences an Unusual Skill....
You'll Have to Buy a Copy....Extraordinary....
A Massive Heap of Crap."
"By Reading All the Information on Your Website I Was Able to Develop a Part of Me I Didn't Know I Would Be Able to Become."
"Innovative Financial Thinking."
"Knowledgeable."
"Holy Toledo! This Is Great Stuff!"
""He Offers Down-to-Earth But
Nevertheless Eye-Opening Insights About
the Why and the How of Early Retirement."
"Challenges Unfounded Assumptions."
"It’s Always Good to Read Something New That Challenges Your Way of Thinking."
"Rob, Thanks for All of Your Articulate, Well-Written and Well-Reasoned Commentary."
"Although Rob and I Don’t See Eye to Eye
on Every Detail, His Site Is a
Valuable Resource for Research."
"Thanks, Rob. I Love Seeing So Many
Personal Finance Bloggers Who Offer Such
High Quality Content on Their Own Sites Come Here
to Weigh In [on Your Ideas]."
"A Ton of Tremendously Useful Content."
"Your Enthusiasm Is Infectious."
"I Woke Up at 4:00 am and Stared at the Wall for 20 Minutes....Thank You for Doing What You Do."
"It Might Just Give You
a New Way of Looking at Saving."
"'Staying Too Long in a Job Where You Don’t Feel Relevant Takes a Toll,' Said Rob Bennett, Who Worked for Years in a Well-Paying Corporate Communications Job Where He Didn’t Have Enough to Do."
"You Have Started One of the Most Interesting
and Stimulating Discussions This Board has Seen
in a Long Time."
"A Respected Author and Commentator, Mr. Bennett has Dedicated Himself to Educating Average Investors to Avoid the Most Common Errors."
"I've Gone from Shattered Dreams of Early Retirement to Glimpses of Hope to Reassurance from Quantitative Research."
"Some of the Most Helpful and Insightful Market Discussions on the Web Take Place on These Pages."
"Rob is the Only Person I Know (If Only via Message Board) Who has Completely Opted Out of Participation in the Stock Bubble. And You Know What? He Has Benefited Immensely from Doing So."
"Makes the Subject of Saving Edgy and Fresh."
"Rob Bennett, the Author of a Book Called Passion Saving, Thinks the Saving Problem Is Partly One of Packaging. So He Prefers to Couch it in the Language of Freedom."
"I LOVE This Article and
Am Proud to be Publishing It!"
"Rob Bennett: Some People Disagree With Him, and He Rubs a Lot of People the Wrong Way. But He Has Interesting Ideas About Valuation-Informed Indexing, and He Delves Into a Lot of What Makes a Successful Investing Strategy."
"Rob….Wow…..Your Response Sent Shivers
Up the Ol’ Pilgrim Spine."
"I Have Counseled My Clients to Allocate a Percentage to Equities Based Upon Market Valuations....I Feel Like I've Found a Kindred Spirit. Fascinating Web Site."
“A Simple Age-Based Asset Allocation Formula Is Not Appropriate, and Any Sensible Asset-Allocation Formula Should Combine Both Age/Investment Horizon and Market Valuation Levels.”
"Had a Guest Post This Week from Rob Bennett, Where He Discusses the Benefits of Value-Informed Indexing, Which I Find Very Intriguing."
"I Can Appreciate Rob's Comments.... Buy-and-Hold?
For the Most Part, a Long Obsolete Theory."
"Utterly Brilliant!"
"Your Website Is So Enjoyable That It Is Keeping Me From My Research As I Am So Excited That I Have Found Such a Valuable Resource."
"What We're Talking About Here Really
...Is Empowerment."
"The Return Predictor Is Based upon the Principle that Over the Long Term, Stock Market Prices Will Reflect the Ten-Years Earnings Growth of the Underlying Companies. Prices Return to a Common Growth Pattern."
"Rob’s Arguments in Favor of Value Investing Actually Make a Lot of Sense In a Way That Should Make Any Rational Buy-and-Holder Uncomfortable."
"What I Don't Understand Is How Rob Can Correspond in Such a Sweet and Polite Way
-- Yet He Irritates Me to No End!"
"You Go About It in a Manner that is Catastrophically Unproductive by Adding Missionary Zeal that Inflates Your Importance and Demeans Others. The Whole Idea That There is a New School of Safe Withdrawal Rates Reeks of Personal Aggrandizement."
"Inflammatory."
“What Warren Buffett Did Was Essentially Quite Close to What Rob Bennett Has Written. Buffett Has in Fact Been Cleverly Incorporating Long-Term Market Timing Based on Valuation of the Market in His Allocation of Money to Stocks.”
"This Report Offers A Fresh Perspective That Is Rarely Found In Other Financial Literature."
"Rob Bennett Says That Market Timing Based on Aggregate P/E Ratios Can Be a Far More Effective Strategy. This Claim Is Consistent With Shiller's Analysis and I Can See How It Might Be So."
"Retiring Early Was A Concept I Did Not Entertain. I Was Going to Retire at 65 After Putting in 40 Years. Now I Am Glad To Say That All That Has Changed."
"In a Couple of Days, I Had
Devoured the Entire Book."
"FIRECalc May Not Be the Last Word
on Safe Withdrawal Rates."
"It Seems to Me That Some on This Board Feel Threatened by the Arrival of Rob and His Ideas. They Feel a Threat to Their Perceived Elite Status."
"You've Got to Say One Thing for Rob. He Has NEVER Lowered Himself to Ad Hominen Attacks -- Subliminal or Otherwise -- on Any Other Person on This Board. Not Once. Ever. At Least Give Him Credit for That."
"I Have Never Seen Rob Show Incivility. No Matter What. Truly Amazing. Either He Is Really the Output of an Artificial Intelligence Program, or the Man's on the Way to Becoming a Saint!"
"You're the Politest Guy on the Internet.
Such a Soft Touch!"
"Props for Keeping Your Cool in the Married with Debt Article. Best of Luck Combating Buy-and-Hold."
"I Caught Up [at the Financial Bloggers Conference] With a Fairly Controversial Financial Blogger
Named Rob Bennett, Who Struck Me As the
Nicest Guy Around. There -- I Said It!"
"In Rob Bennett's Case, He Was Banned for No Known Listed Forum Policy. Except His Viewpoint Was Different From Other Bogleheads and [He Was Perceived As] a Threat."
"Mr. Bennett, You Are Spot on About Integrating Some Type of Valuation Filter to One's Stock Allocation. Astute Investors Have Incorporated Some Type of 'Valuation Timing' Into Their Investment Decisions Since the Beginning of Time."
"His Insights Into What Is Really Going On In The Stock Market Are Quite Compelling."
"It Was an Epiphany...Valuation-Informed Indexing Beats Buy-and-Hold Over Most Long-Term Holding Periods at Much Lower Volatility."
"I Am Intrigued By Your Ideas."
"I Read the Book and I Loved It.
The Philosophy Resonated with Me.
I Am a Believer in Your Concept."
"If Your Investment Ideas Can Do for Investing
What Weston Price’s Ideas Did for Food,
You’ve Got Our Attention."
"I Have Looked at His Website and Reviewed His Research and Find It Both Compelling and Completely Logical and Common-Sense-Based."
"If Investors Paid More Attention to Valuations, We Would Have Fewer Boom-and-Bust Cycles. The Investing Institutions Are Definitely Going to Avoid It Because It Affects Their Income."
"The Calculators on Your Site Are Great Resources. It Amazes Me How So Many People Can Say 'Valuations Matter' Yet, in the Next Breath, They'll Say That We Should Ignore Valuations."
"Must Read As Per My Viewpoint
For All Value Seekers."
"His Approach Is Both Mathematically Rigorous
and Easy to Understand."
"Difficult Subjects Can Be Explained to the Most Slow-Witted Man If He Has Not Formed Any Idea of Them. But the Simplest Thing Cannot Be Made Clear to the Most Intelligent Man If He Believes He Knows Already What Is Laid Before Him."
"I Am Not Afraid. I Was Born to Do This."
"I Certainly Have Seen the Academic Profession Squelching Unfashionable ideas and Have Often Been on the Wrong Side of It. Kuhn Shows How Most Pathbreaking Scientific Ideas Are Rejected at First, Usually for Decades.”
"First They Ignore You, Then They Ridicule You, Then They Fight You, Then You Win."
"We Cannot Assume the Existence of Predictability Just Because There Are No Studies That Fully Reject It."
"I Am Also Extremely Grateful to Rob Bennett for Motivating This Topic and Contributing His Experience and Encouragement."
"Rob Bennett Was an Early Pioneer in 3rd Generation Modeling by Advocating (Through Various Online Forums) that Withdrawal Rates Must Be Adjusted for Market Valuations Consistent with Research by Campbell and Shiller."
"I Am Fascinated by the Growing Body of Research that Revolves Around the P/E10 Ratio by Robert Shiller, Doug Short, Wade Pfau, Michael Kitces, John Hussman, Crestmont Research, Jim Otar, Mike Philbrick, Adam Butler & Rob Bennett."
"Rob Is an Enigma in the Personal Finance World. He Has Interesting Theories on Investing Based on Market Valuations. But He Weaves a Tale Which Makes the Stories of Alexander Litvinenko & Gareth Williams Seem Tame by Comparison."
"In Recent Years, the 4 Percent Rule
Has Been Thrown Into Doubt."
"A Safe Withdrawal Rate Is Very Dependent
on the Valuation of the Stockmarket
at the Retirement Date."
"I Have Read Everything I Can About Valuation-Informed Indexing. Buy-and-Hold Is Extremely Problematic. I Respect the Passion, Hard Work and Research That You Have Put Into This Very Important Issue. Your Work Has Huge Value."
"The World of Personal Finance Blogging Needs More Rob Bennetts. He’s Passionate. He’s Intelligent. He’s Writing Things That Go Against the Grain."
"Beyond Awesome."
"The Wealth Management Industry Seems Intent on Containing This Discussion for Fear Clients Might Discover that the Emperor Has No Clothes."
"Recommended Reading."
“All Who Are Still Holding Equities at Present Levels Because Their Financial Adviser Insists that Timing Market Cycles Is Impossible to Do -- Read This!"
"The Fact that Aggressive and Short-Term Market Timing Was Unproductive Did Not Mean That There Were Never Times When It Would Be Wealth-Maximizing to Get Out of the Market."
"The Amount of Return You Can Expect From a Diversified Equity Portfolio Is Inversely Correlated to the Market Valuation at the Start of the Holding Period. It Is One of the Most Robust Statistical Relationships in Modern Finance."
"Why Would Your Job Be Jeopardized
By Such a Sensible Claim?"
"Received Worrisome E-Mail from Rob Bennett. Warns of Risk with Buy-and-Hold Investing
-- I Have No Clue."
"As Attorney, Tax Expert and Financial Writer Rob Bennett Told Us, the Problem Is That, By the Time Shiller Published His Research, Many Big Names Had Already Endorsed Buy-and-Hold."
"This Seems to Me to Be a Fundamental Challenge to Some of the Most Basic Tenets of the Boglehead Paradigm."
"You Want to be Very, Very Wary of Anything Connected with Rob Bennett, the Most Infamous Troll in the History of Investing Forums on the Internet."
“I’ve Had My Fill of Those Long-Winded Posts that Include Distortions, Unsubstantiated Claims, Misquotes and Comments Taken Out of Context.”
"Haven't You Noticed Yet That NO ONE Discusses Your Ideas, NO ONE Mentions Your Name, NO ONE Goes To Your Web Site."
"I've Had Similar Experiences. I Know of Two Young Professors Who Wanted to Do Research on Fundamental Index and Reported to Me That Their Colleagues Advised Them That This Line of Research Could Derail Their Career Prospects."
"As with Drug Studies Funded by Drug Companies, It Would Be Churlish to Suppose that the Chicago School of Business Was in the Bag. But It Would Also Be Idealistic to Assume That There Was No Funding Bias at All."
"This Sort of Intimidation Is Not Acceptable. The Cigarette and Pharmaceutical Industries Found Research Supporting Their Products By Funding It. But That Was Big Money Supporting Outcomes, Not Dissuading Others."
"Financial Economists Gave Little Warning to the Public About the Fragility of Their Models. There Is No Ethical Code for Professional Economic Scientists. There Should Be One."
"The Situation [Referring to the Intimidation Tactics Used to Silence Academic Researcher Wade Pfau's Reporting of the Dangers of Buy-and-Hold Investing Strategies] Seems Well Below Any Professional and Academic Acceptable Standards."
Many Academics Can Become Quite Strident When Their Views Are Challenged. Academia Is Often Subject to Self-Serving Bias That Obliterates Ethical Bounds."
"I Don't Like Too Much the Conspiracy Idea. I Am Not Pressured By Anyone in My Research."
"This Is What Investing Should Be -- Calculated, Deliberate, Confident, Informed and Simple."
"It Is Obvious that Rob, in Attempting to Identify New Safe Withdrawal Rate Strategies...Is Goring Your Ox. If Rob Improves on [the] Safe Withdrawal Rate Methodology, the Implication Is Clear: You Are All, Metaphorically, Out of Business."
"I Applaud His Effort to Inject Another Piece of Objectivity Into a Very Complex, Highly Subjective Topic -- Making Money in the Market."
"Naturally, I Am Finding That Valuation-Informed Indexing Can Allow You to Reach a Wealth Target With a Lower Saving Rate and to Use a Higher Withdrawal Rate in Retirement Than You Could With a Fixed Allocation."
"A Careful Examination of Past Returns Can Establish Some Probabilities About the Prospective Parameters of Return, Offering Intelligent Investors a Basis for Rational Expectations About Future Returns."
"The Ability to Estimate the Long-Term Future Returns of the Major Asset Classes Is Perhaps the Most Important Investment Skill That An Indivisual Can Possess."
"The Stock Market Resembles Roulette. In Both Cases, the Accuracy of Sensible Forecasts Rises Over Time."
"Returns Are for the Most Part a Matter of Simple Arithmetic...Much of Our Industry Seems Fearful of Basic Arithmetic of This Sort."
"How Can It Be That One-Year Returns Are So Apparantly Random and Yet Ten-Year Returns Are Mostly Forecastable? In Looking at One-Year Returns, One Sees a Lot of Noise. But Over Longer Time Intervals the Noise Effectively Averages Out and Is Less Important."
"The Notion That Rich Valuations Will Not Be Followed By Sub-Par Long-Term Returns Is a Speculative Idea That Runs Counter to All Historical Evidence. It Is an Iron Law of Finance That Valuations Drive Long-Term Returns."
"It's January and the Temperature Is Below Freezing. If You Asked Me Whether It Will be Warmer or Cooler Next Tuesday, I Would Be Unable to Say. However, If You Asked Me What Temperature to Expect on April 9, I Could Predict "Warmer Than Today" and Almost Surely Be Right."
"If the Response Is "Who Knew?", It Won't Be Much Comfort for Retirees in the Employment Line at Wal-Mart. This is Especially True Since a Rational Understanding of History and the Drivers of Longer-Term Stock Returns Can Help Retirees To Avoid That Surprise."
"New of the Demise of the Random Walk Has Only Very Slowly Spread, In Part Because Its Overthrow Came as a Shock. If the Random Walk Hypothesis Were Correct, the Most Likely Return Would Be the Historic Average Return. The Evidence, However, Is Strongly Against This."
"I Don't Think We Can Debate the Merits of This Type of Forecasting [Referring to the Numbers Generated by The Stock-Return Predictor] Unless We Believe 'This Time It's Different.'"
"I've Seen Absolutely Nothing From You That I Can Use in a Tangible Fashion to Formulate an Investment Plan. Your Ideas Are So Mushy That It's a Complete Waste of Time to Even Consider Them."
"Do You Really Think Your Tool
[The Stock-Return Predictor]
Is 'Wiser' Than the Market?
If It Was That Easy,
Everybody Would Be Doing It."
"The Expected Return of Stocks [As Reported By The Stock-Return Predictor] Needs To Be At Least the Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Rate for Stock Investing To Make Sense."
"I Have Used Valuations to Adjust My Asset Allocation For Many Years With Very Favorable Results."
"I Don't Care If You Do or Don't Believe That the Market Will Behave Similarly in the Future As It Has in the Past. Either Way, This [The Stock-Return Predictor] Is an Excellent Way to Understand What the Market Has Done In the Past."
"My Role Is To Give People Who Don't Like What the Historical Stock-Return Data Says About the Effect of Valuations on Long-Term Returns Somebody To Yell At On Internet Discussion Boards."
"It Really Is a Shame and Indefensible That So Many Feel the Need to Jump Into It With No Interest of Posting on the Topic But Just to Disrupt. Are You That Insecure? Some on the Forum Have an Interest in This Topic. If You Don't, Stay Out!"
"Irrational Behavior Does Follow Patterns. But How Many Experts in Behavioral Finance Believe That Such Knowledge Can Be Used to Predict Markets? Basically, None. Your Model Cannot Attain the Level of Predictive Value You Claim."
"The Safe Withdrawal Rate Studies Are Based on History. This [The Retirement Risk Evaluator] Shows, Based on the Same History, What the Probabilities Are for the Future at Various Starting Points. If the First Has Value, Then Surely This Does Too."
"There Are Hundreds of People Who Contributed to This. This Calculator [The Stock-Return Predictor] Demonstrates in a Compelling Way the Power of This New Internet Discussion-Board Communications Medium."
"A P/E10 of'26' Is Bad. Now Look at the 30-Year Return Predicted by the Calculator -- 5.4 Percent Real. That's Not Bad. There Are All Sorts of Strategic Implications That Follow From Understanding That Stocks Provide Different Sorts of Returns Over Different Sorts of Time-Periods."
"I Would Never Invest in Anything Without Having Any Idea What the Expected Return Is. For Instance, I Would Not Walk Into a Bank And Say "I'll Take One Certificate of Deposit, Please" WIthout Asking What Rate They Are Offering."
"I've Seen Things Said on Investing Boards That I Have Never Heard Said in Discussions of Any Non-Investing Topic. The Question of Whether Valuations Affect Long-Term Returns Is a Topic That Causes People More Emotional Angst Than Does Abortion or Impeachment Proceedings or the War in Iraq."
"It's Not Possible For Those Who Have Come to Believe That Stocks Are Always Best to Accept that Valuations Matter. The Two Beliefs Are Mutually Exclusive. If Valuations Matter, There Is Obviously Some Valuation Level At Which Stocks Are Not Best. The Two Paradigms Cannot Be Reconciled."
"The Great Safe Withdrawal Rate Is Over. Rob Bennett Has Won.The Technical Evidence Supporting This Assertion Is Rock Solid."
"I Am Afraid that the Emperor SWR [for "Safe Withdrawal Rate"] Has No Clothes."
"I Cite You and John Walter Russell in My Paper as the Earliest and Strongest Advocates of This Approach [New School Safe Withdrawal Rate Research]."
"Dear Rob -- I Just Became Aware of Your Past Research in September. Since Then, I've Read Archives From Many Discussion Boards and Websites, and I Always Find Your Writing to Be Very Interesting and Intriguing."
"I Think Rob Bennett Did Provide An Important Contribution in Terms of Describing a Way for P/E10 to Guide Asset Allocation for Long-Term Conservative Investors. I Also Think He Was Right on the Issue of Safe Withdrawal Rates."
"What Studies Show This [That Long-Term Timing Doesn't Work]? In Particular, Are There Some Academic Studies That I Haven't Found Yet? That's All I Want to Know."
"Because the Precise Timing of This Mean Reversion Is Not Known in Advance, Expecting the Result to Happen in the Short-Term Will Not Be Possible. But Long-Term Investors Who Can Be Patient Can Wait for This Mean Reversion and Will Eventually Come Out Ahead."
"Your Work Is at Odds with the Ethos of the Board -- Here the Theme is John Bogle's Philosophy, Which Eschews Market Timing. This Board Came Into Existence to ESCAPE One Individual, the Very Individual With Whom You Have Openly Aligned Yourself."
"The Problem With Long-Term Market Timing Is That It Takes Too Long to Find Out If You Are Right or Wrong."
"Why Is It Such an Odious Violation of the Tenets of Bogleheadism to Explore Whether Someone Who Has Enough Patience Might Be Able to Benefit from the Transitory Nature of Speculative Returns (the Idea That the P/E Ratio Eventually Ends Up Where It Started)?"
"Let Me Explain Why I Posted About This Here. Valuation-Informed Indexing Has Had Critics for Years. But Until Norbert Did It In 2008, Nobody Seemed to Have Provided a Serious Investigation of It. I Couldn't Understand Why. That Bothered Me."
"If You Really Don't Like Market Timing in Any and All Forms, You May Not See Any Point in an Empirical Investigation. You View Me as One of a Long Line of Hucksters Trying to Sell You Some Snake Oil. I Don't Want to Be Such a Person."
"Having a Completely Ineleastic Demand for Equities Is a Bit Bonkers. No One Acts That Way with Life's Other Important Commodities. Campbell Advocates a Linear Valuations-Based Strategy so That You Wouldn't Be Making Big Changes. This Would Be Like Rebalancing But More Flexible."
"The Whole Idea of Valuation-Informed Indexing Belongs to You. Do You Mind if I call the Paper 'Valuation-Informed Indexing'? I Would Give You Credit. I Have Been Toying With the Idea of Sending the Paper to the Journal of Finance, Which Is the Most Prestigious Journal in Academic Finance."
"I Definitely Need to Cite You as the Founder of Valuation-Informed Indexing, As I Have Not Found Anyone Else Who Can Lay Claim to That. Shiller Pointed Out the Predictive Power of P/E10 But Never Discussed How to Incorporate It Into Asset Allocation, As Far As I Know."
"I Tested a Wide Variety of Assumptions About Asset Allocation, Valuation-Based Decision Rules, Whether the Period Is 10, 20, 30 or 40 Years, and Lump-Sum vs. Dollar-Cost Averaging To Show That the Results Are Quite Robust to Changes In Any of These Assumptions."
"Yes, Virginia, Valuation-Informed Indexing Works!"
"I Wrote Up the Programs to Test Your Valuation-Informed Indexing Strategies Against Buy-and-Hold and I Am Quite Excited. You Say in the RobCast That VII Should Beat Buy-and-Hold About 90 Percent of the Time. I Am Getting Results That Support This."
"Never Underestimate the Power of a Dominant Academic Idea to Choke Off Competing Ideas, and Never Underestimate the Unwillingness of Academics to Change Their Views in the Face of Evidence. They Have Decades of Their Research and Academic Standing to Defend."
"There's So Much That's False and Nutty
in Modern Investing Practice."
"Following Conventional Wisdom Has Led a Generation of Investors Down the Road to Ruin."
"It Is Sad That the Idea That Price Doesn't Matter...Should Ever Have Been Seriously Considered".
"The Conventional Wisdom of Modern Investing Is Largely Myth and Urban Legend."
"Economics Is a Dog's Breakfast of Theoretical Ideas and Alleged Causal Relationships That Are At All Times Unproven and In Dispute."
"Since They Did Not Diagnose the Disease, There Is Little Popular Confidence That They Know the Cure. What If Economics Is, Actually, At the Same Level as Medicine Was When Doctors Still Believed in the Application of Leeches?"
"One of the Most Remarkable Errors
in the History of Economics."
"Everything Has Fallen Apart."
"We Wonder Why Funds and Banks, Full of the Best and Brightest, Have Made Such a Mess of Things. Part of the Reason Is That We Have Taught Economic Nonsense to Two Generations of Students."
"Perhaps Most Scandalously, the Theory [Behind Buy-and-Hold] Remained Received Wisdom Long After Empirical and Theoretical Arguments Had Demolished It Within the Academic Community."
"I Love the Humans Dearly (the Title of the Book I Am Writing Is Investing for Humans: How to Get What Works on Paper to Work in Real Life) But They Can Be a Trial at Times. Hey! Helping the Humans Learn What It Takes to Invest Effectively Is Not All That Different From Being Married!
"We Are Going to See Hearts Melt Following the Next Crash. I Will Be Working Side-By-Side With All of My Many Buy-and-Hold Friends to Rebuild Our Broken Economy."
"Wow, I Did Not Realize You Had Achieved This Much Success and Had Many Devoted Believers/Followers. That’s Great, Then Ignore the Opposition. It Is Great to Have Opposition: That Means You Are Doing Something Right."
"I Do NOT Believe I Know It All. I Believe That Shiller Discovered Something Very Important and It Appalls Me That More People Are Not Exploring the Implications of His Findings. My Aim Is To Launch a National Debate."
"I Can See How Many Readers Would Be Put Off by the Somewhat Sensational/Scandalist Tone and Would Not Persevere to Read, Thinking You Are Losing Your Mind."
"I LOVE Everything About Buy-and-Hold Other Than the Failure to Encourage Investors to Take Price Into Consideration When Setting Their Stock Allocations. That's a Mistake That Was Made Because Shiller’s Research Was Not Available at the Time The Strategy Was Being Developed."
"Valuation-Informed Indexing Sounds Like a Real Thing. If It Is and I Can Thoroughly Understand It, Then It Will End Up In My Classrooms and in My Students' Minds (Of Course, With References to You and Wade)."
"I Can Confirm Wade Pfau's Experience. Whenever I Send My Papers to the Financial Analysts Journal or Similar Traditional Journals, I Get Rejected."
"As a Fan of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, I Know That Progress Can Be Frustratingly Slow and What Is Typically Needed Is Either a Crisis or the Ascent of a New Generation of Scientists Who Did Not Build Their Careers on the Old Models and Theories."
"We Trace the Deeper Roots [of the Financial Crisis] to the Economics' Profession's Insistence on Constructing Models That, By Design, Disregard the Key Elements Driving Outcomes in Real World Markets."
"Rob Gets Himself So Worked Up Over What Someone Else Is Doing With Their Own Money and Not Bothering Rob in the Least. As Long As They Aren't Knocking on Your Basement Door, What Do You Care? They Are Happy and Content. Leave Well Enough Alone and Focus on Your Own Account."
"I've Been on Forum Since the BBS Days and I Think Rob is Special. He Could Be an Internet Meme If He Put Some Effort Into It. Someday, He Will Realize That the Only Thing He's Good At Is Being an Epic Loser. He Just Needs to Embrace That Idea and Run With It. Watch Out, LOLCats, Here Comes Pathetic Guy!"
"Your Lies Are Not Even in the Realm of the Possible, Much Less Actually Credible, Much Less Actually True."
"I'm Your Friend. I Am Not a Boil on Your Ass."
"You Guys [the Greaney Goons] Are the Same Jokers Who Have Done This Before, Sparring with Rob Over Nonsensical Issues On This Site and Others, Leveling Personal Attacks, and You Don't Even Use Real Names! Rob Is Entitled to His Opinion, But the Fact That You Challenge Every Jot and Tittle of What He Says Makes It Clear You Have An Unholy Agenda. Please Take It Elsehwere."
"Rob, Take This As Friendly Advice. You're a Smart and Articulate Guy and You Could Be Making Valuable Contributions to This Discussion. I've Dealt with the Mentally Ill Before and I've Found That They Sometimes Can Be Reasonable If Gently Redirected."
"Always Remember Others May Hate You, But Those Who Hate You Don't Win Unless You Hate Them, and Then You Destroy Yourself."
"I’m a Numbers Guy. And I Believe I Understand Rob’s Thesis, that Future Returns, Over the Next Decade, Have a Tight Inverse Correlation to the PE10 for the Starting Point. Remember, Correlation Doesn’t Need to be 100%, Only That There’s a Bell Curve of Potential Outcomes that Shift Meaningfully Based on the Input."
"What a Difference a Threat to Get the Father of Two Small Children Fired From His Job Has on an Investing Discussion, Eh? Long Live Buy-and-Hold! It’s Science! With a Marketing Twist!"
"I Respect Rob and His Analysis. He's Bright, Energetic and Passionate. [The Goon Stuff] Is Really Nonsense. I Enjoy a Thought-Provoking Conversation With People I Respect."
"The Fact that Shiller is a Proponent of the Approach Takes it from a Fringe View to Mainstream, in my Opinion."
"I Have had Academic Researchers Tell Me That They Dream of the Day When They Will be Able to do Honest Research Once Again. I Have had Investment Advisors Tell me That They Dream of the Day When They Will be Able to Give Honest Investing Advice Again."
"Let’s Call a Spade a Spade, Shall We? Wade Pfau Stole Your Research and Put His Name on it, Throwing You Just a Tiny Crumb of Acknowledgement to Ward Off a Lawsuit. He’s Profiting Handsomely By His Theft, Leading a Charmed Life, Widely Published, Widely Respected. While Rob Bennett Continues to Toil in Total Obscurity. It’s So Incredibly Unfair, I Think If It Happened to Me, It Could Actually Drive Me Insane."
by Rob
I gave a five-minute Ignite presentation to the 2014 Financial Bloggers Conference (FinCon14) called “How to Predict Stock Returns for Fun and Profit.” Here’s the video:

This is Dynamik Widget Area. You can add content to this area by going to Appearance > Widgets in your WordPress Dashboard and adding new widgets to this area.
I did not think you could do it, but you self-censored yourself for five minutes. No talk of “Goons”, “Death Threats”, “Threats to get researchers fired”, “Prison Sentences”, “Board Generals”, or “500 million dollar paydays.” It’s almost as if you know that acting like a crazy idiot in public will first get you laughed at, and then get you hauled off to the looney bin.
I wish that everyone in this field began talking about the Goons and the death threats and the prison sentences and all the rest when they first became an issue, Anonymous. If they had we would be in a very different place.
There is huge leverage in talking openly and honestly about these matters. Once we do something about the intimidation tactics that have been holding us back for 33 years, all the bad stuff goes away and we all get to enjoy the benefits of being the luckiest generation of investors who ever walked Planet Earth.We ALL want that. Bogle wants that. Bernstein wants that. YOU want that.
The big question we face as a society is — How do we get from the awful place where we are today to the wonderful place where we all want to be tomorrow? We don’t get there by ignoring the problem. We get there by FACING the problem.
That means making reference to the Goons and to the death threats and to the prison sentences. Dealing with the problem solves the problem. Dealing with the problem gets us to the other side of The Big Black Mountain. That’s where I want to be. That’s where we ALL want to be.
My take.
Rob
It’s almost as if you know that acting like a crazy idiot in public will first get you laughed at, and then get you hauled off to the looney bin.
Were the reporters who reported on how President Nixon obstructed justice over something that would have been a two-day story if he has just told the truth from the first day crazy idiots, Anonymous?
What Nixon did was crazy. But Nixon was a human just like Bogle is a human. Humans sometimes do things that get them in terrible fixes. If we care about those humans , we make an effort to help them. We don’t ignore the matter and thereby make it worse.
I love Jack Bogle. There wouldn’t be any Valuation-Informed Indexing were it not for the good work done by my hero Jack Bogle for many years before I came on the scene. I owe him a debt of gratitude.
So, yes, I speak up when I see him committing criminal acts of financial fraud. That’s part of what it means to be a friend to someone.
People hate it when I talk about the death threats and the financial fraud and the prison sentences. I get that loud and clear.
How else do we get to the other side, where we all want to be?
Do you have any better ideas?
There are millions of people in the process of seeing their retirements fail today. Do those people matter?
They matter to me.
So, yes, I will continue to talk about the death threats and the financial fraud and the prison sentences.
Until enough others work up the courage to talk about it and thereby bring an end to the ugly side of this and help us all get to a place where we can enjoy being the luckiest generation of investors who ever walked Planet Earth.
You don’t love Jack Bogle as much as I do.
You don’t love Mel Linduaer as much as I do.
You don’t love John Greaney as much as I do.
That’s the bottom line here.
No apologies.
None whatsoever.
I talk about the prison sentences out of love. Because I want to shorten them.
I will not stop loving my many Buy-and-Hold friends and I will not stop SHOWING my love for my Buy-and-Hold friends by urging them to come clean and by pointing out to them the consequences that inevitably follow from them failing to do so.
I naturally wish you all the best things that this life has to offer a person regardless of what investing strategies you elect to pursue.
Rob
“So, yes, I will continue to talk about the death threats and the financial fraud and the prison sentences.”
But here and only here. Not in public. How do we know which is the real Rob?
So, in your speech next year, can we count on you to discuss your thoughts on goons, prison sentences, death threats, job threats and $500 million settlements?
If you gave a public presentation on your claims of fraud, goons, prison sentences, death threats, $500 million windfalls, etc, And also took questions from the audience, I would not only come, but I would pay admission to see that.
After the next crash, we will accept as a society that we need to make the shift to Valuation-Informed Indexing and we will all come clean.
The real Rob is the guy who tells the truth about safe withdrawal rates.
If there had never been any death threats, there never would have been any death threats to discuss.
I discuss the death threats because I need to discuss the death threats to lead us all to a place where we can discuss accurate SWR numbers at every board and blog on the internet.
Both Robs are real. One is process-oriented. One is substance-oriented. Process is important because it is by following proper processes (the laws of the United States) that we get to good substance (research-based investing advice).
People are afraid to deal with the process questions. That is so. They are afraid because of the death threats and the threats to destroy careers. So your point is a circular one. We cannot develop a solid understanding of the substance questions until we solve the process problems. Solving the process problems is imperative. And we obviously cannot solve the process problems until we all start talking about them.
For TODAY I only discuss the process problems here. But will that remain so following the next crash? I don’t think so. We are going to need to make a transition from Buy-and-Hold to Valuation-Informed Indexing. To do that, we all need to come clean. So we will need to work through what happened on the process side. The materials at this site will help.
Some of the materials here will help me. But some of the materials here will help YOU, X. My job is to pull us all together, not to make Buy-and-Holders look bad. When I make claims that favor the Buy-and-Holders, I need evidence to support them if I am going to convince people. Some of the materials here supply me with the evidence I need.
I am not saying that all of the materials here help you. Some obviously do not. But some do. The purpose of the materials here is to tell BOTH sides of the story. The purpose is to help me to after the crash be able to tell a story that pulls us all together so that we can all work together to rebuild our broken economy.
A new idea cannot grow if it is not discussed.
The laws of our nation permit new ideas to grow.
We got on the wrong track at some point re what the peer-reviewed research says about how stock investing works in the real world.
We need to fix that problem. We need to get back on the right track.
My job is to gather the materials we need as a society to do what helps us all, to get us to where we all want to go.
My goal, stated simply, is to be able to say precisely what I believe about stock investing at every board and blog on the internet.
I don’t want that just for me. I want that for my friend Jack Bogle. And for all my other Buy-and-Hold friends.
I want that for everyone.
If you have ideas re how we can get to that magic place, please share them.
Everything I do is aimed at that purpose.
You are right that people hate hearing about the death threats and the prison sentences. We have no dispute re that point.
But I have to get us to that magic place. If getting us there requires that I spend some time talking (only here!) about death threats and prisons sentences, then that’s what I need to do, like it or not.
Instead of asking “which is the real Rob?” you should be asking “which is the real United States?” Do our laws show what we are? Or does our current reality show what we are?
I say that our laws show what we are. I say that we will be enforcing those laws following the crash.
Our laws are not self-enforcing. It takes people to enforce them. People need to work up the courage to stand up to the Wall Street Con Men and their Internet Goon Squads if our country is to be what we all intend for it to be.
My job is to help that process play out.
We have delayed telling millions of middle-class investors about Valuation-Informed Indexing for 33 years now. How do we change that? That’s the question before ALL of us today.
I think we do it by telling people about the intimidation tactics that have been holding us back for 33 years now.
THEN we move on to the fun stuff.
I hope that helps a bit.
Rob
Say that Bogle gave his “I Was Wrong” speech and the New York Times wrote it up.
And that within six months of that date we had 50 percent Buy-and-Holders and 50 percent Valuation-Informed Indexers at the Bogleheads Forum.
There would be no more death threats, right?
We would all be friends, right?
We would believe different things about investing. But we would be friends.
It is the power imbalance that has caused all the trouble.
The Buy-and-Holders make use of death threats and threats to get academic researchers fired from their jobs BECAUSE THEY CAN. They engage in that garbage BECAUSE IT WORKS.
It doesn’t work anymore once there are prison sentences announced. There is no power imbalance once we have 50 percent Valuation-Informed Indexers at the board.
WE NEED TO ADDRESS THAT POWER IMBALANCE.
Once that is done, all the fun stuff starts.
The purpose is to enjoy the fun stuff. But we cannot do that without first addressing the power imbalance.
The laws making financial fraud a felony were adopted to help us in this sort of situation. So we should begin making use of them.
Enforcing the laws against financial fraud doesn’t just help the Valuation-Informed Indexers. It helps the Buy-and-Holders too. Enforcing the law HELPS US ALL.
My take.
Rob
So, in your speech next year, can we count on you to discuss your thoughts on goons, prison sentences, death threats, job threats and $500 million settlements?
If the crash comes between now and then, I think there’s a good chance that you will hear that.
I don’t talk about that stuff except for here because people are not ready to hear that stuff today. It’s important stuff and I want people to know about it. But I cannot force people to listen to a message that they don’t want to hear.
Does that not make good sense?
Rob
If you gave a public presentation on your claims of fraud, goons, prison sentences, death threats, $500 million windfalls, etc, And also took questions from the audience, I would not only come, but I would pay admission to see that.
If you set it up, I will certainly show up and make the presentation and answer any and all questions, Anonymous.
These are important matters that every citizen of this country needs to know about. I will do all that I can to spread knowledge of what has happened.
I told a good bit of the story in the e-mails that I sent to the 30,000 academic researchers. I intend to re-send those e-mails following the next price crash. Do you think I might get a stronger response following the crash, which will put us in jeopardy of falling into the Second Great Depression? I do.
I will do everything that I can do. But I obviously cannot do more than that. I can communicate the message. I cannot compel people to listen and act.
Do you see?
Rob
Why would you make a presentation about stocks when you don’t invest in stocks. It is like the Pope giving advice on sex.
The Pope gives advice on sex all the time, Anonymous. There have been entire encyclicals written about the sex question.
And I invest in stocks to a greater extent than you do. The entire point of Valuation-Informed Indexing is to take the fullest advantage of the great returns provided by stocks. Valuation-Informed Indexers own more stocks than Buy-and-Holders over the course of an investing lifetime because they make their purchases at better prices. That’s why Valuation-Informed Indexers always end up ahead. The difference is that we invest in the way that works best over the course of an investing lifetime while Buy-and-Holders do what feels good in the moment.
You don’t love stocks. You love your Get Rich Quick impulse. When prices crash, you will hate stocks. The emotional thing to do when prices are sky high is to love stocks and the emotional thing to do when stocks are dirt cheap is to hate stocks. Buy-and-Hold is pure emotion. That’s why you hate the idea of someone being permitted to discuss the last 33 years of peer-reviewed research.
Valuation-Informed Indexing is anti-emotionalism. It is not anti-stocks. It is perfectly possible for investors to invest in stocks in non-emotional ways. And the long-term payoff is huge.
Rob
Like I said, it is like the Pope giving sex advice. He has no experience.
Just think of all the financial harm that would have happened by missing out on one of the greatest bull markets we have ever seen.
Experience in some circumstances is a positive and in other circumstances is a negative. Experience can lead to bias. Is a heroin addict the best person to ask re whether taking drugs is a good thing or not? The heroin addict will do anything to get his fix. But he is not acting in his best interests, despite his wealth of experience with taking drugs. His addiction makes it impossible for the heroin addict to think clearly.
So it is with those who invest their retirement money pursuant to a Get Rich Quick approach. When you post abusively, it is your addiction talking, not the real you. There was a time when you cared what the peer-reviewed research says. That’s why you became a Buy-and-Holder in the first place.
Your experience with Buy-and-Hold hurt you rather than helped you. Becoming addicted to the pure Get Rich Quick approach made you hate the peer-reviewed research that you once loved. Your experience had proven to be a negative.
A bull market is the worst thing that can happen to stock investors. Secular bull markets ALWAYS lead to secular bear markets. There has never in our 140 years of stock market history been an exception. And secular bear markets ALWAYS lead to economic crises. Again, there has never been a single exception. The accumulated losses that follow from bull/bear markets are always so great as to cause our economic system to collapse.
This is a good thing? Huh?
We would all be better off if we invested pursuant to our self-interests and priced stocks properly at all times. To do that, we would have to have access to honest and accurate reports re what the peer-reviewed research in this field shows about what works. The Wall Street Con Men are not necessarily our friends.
My take.
Rob
Experience matters and results matter. When I go to the doctor, I choose someone that has experience and has been successful. Same goes for investing. I listen to people like John Bogle and William Berstein because they have a track record of making money, unlike Rob Bennett.
So Bernie Madoff was the best qualified investment advisor right up until the day his fraudulent fund collapsed?
I don’t buy it, Anonymous.
Integrity matters.
And common sense matters.
And the findings of the peer-reviewed research matters.
I’m all for making money. But I want the money in my retirement account to last. I have zero interest in investing in some Ponzi scheme that gets me excited for a few years and then leaves me with next to nothing when I need the money to retire on.
The Get Rich Quick strategy advocated by Bogle and Bernstein has a very, very poor track record. It has been causing huge amounts of human misery for 140 years now. Has Bogle’s advice worked through a single bull/bear cycle? Saying that he has been “successful” is like saying that Madoff’s fund was successful until the day he was put in prison. I mean, come on.
If Buy-and-Hold were a legitimate strategy, we never would have seen the Buy-and-Holders advance a single death threat when the errors in their Old School retirement studies were exposed. People with legitimate strategies based on real research don’t behave that way. Not ever.
I love Bogle and Bernstein. Make no mistake. But the Bogle and Bernstein that I love are the Bogle and Bernstein that advised investors to take the findings of the peer-reviewed research into consideration when forming their investing strategies. The Bogle and Bernstein of today are the opposites of their earlier selves in every possible way. If you told the old Bogle and Bernstein that there would come a day when they would be involved in the most massive act of financial fraud in U.S. history, they would have been horrified.
I don’t need to engage in financial fraud to promote Valuation-Informed Indexing. That’s because I have 33 years of peer-reviewed research backing up what I say. I learned the importance of checking the peer-reviewed research from Bogle and Bernstein. So I would feel that I was betraying my friendship with these two giants if I were to endorse the acts of financial fraud that their elder versions of themselves have engaged in, Not this boy.
As for doctors, would you go to a doctor who bled his patients because that was state-of-the-art medicine many years ago? We learn new things all the time. We learned in 1981 that long-term timing always works and is always required. People like Bogle and Bernstein need to keep up with the literature if they are going to put themselves forward as “experts” in this field. And they need to possess enough courage to walk to the front of the room and say the words “I Was Wrong” when new findings are published showing that their old understanding is in error.
Bogle and Bernstein are in the process of destroying themselves. And I love these guys. So I have worked up the courage to speak up. And I will continue to do so. I urge all who care about them and about the millions of middle-class investors whose lives they are in the process of destroying to do so as well.
That’s my sincere take re these terribly important matters, in any event.
Rob
Bernie wasn’t investing and neither are you. I invest like Jack and Bill. I don’t believe in timing get rich quick schemes
You are in good company, Anonymous.
There are millions of smart people who invest like Jack and Bill.
I certainly wish you (and all of them) the best of luck with it.
Rob
“There are millions of smart people who invest like Jack and Bill. I certainly wish you (and all of them) the best of luck with it.”
It is a trademark quality of your particular personality disorder that you most certainly do not wish good fortune on that poster and yet feel that you must say that you do.
All of the laws and social customs and cultural artifacts of our nation evidence that same “personality disorder,” Grandpop.
We are a diverse nation. We have Democrats and Republicans living together. We have young people and old people living together. We have people with black skin and people with white skin living together. We have men and women living together. We have people from the South and people from the Northeast living together. And on and on and on.
For people with differences to live together in harmony, there has to be a mutual respect for the other guy’s position. I have evidenced my respect for my many Buy-and-Hold friends in every one of the hundreds of thousands of posts that I have put forward over the past 12 years. You Goons never evidence any respect whatsoever for Valuation-Informed Indexers. You only evidence hate and envy and anger and contempt.
That’s the problem. That’s always been the problem.
It’s not in my power to make you stop hating.
But I pray that I never join you.
There’s no one on this planet who feels the respect and affection that I feel for Jack Bogle. I think it would be fair to say that I feel more respect and affection for the man than he feels for himself.
And, yes, I care what happens to Anonymous and you and Mel Linduaer and John Greaney too.
I don’t care ONLY for them. I care for the millions of middle-class investors whose lives they are in the process of destroying too. But I certainly care for them.
I don’t believe that there are two “sides” re this matter. It is my strongly held view that we are all in this together and that deep in our hearts we all want the same things. We ALL agreed to follow the published rules of the boards and blogs at which we post. There is nothing else re which every last one of us is in agreement as much as we are in at least formal agreement that the tactics employed by you Goons should never be tolerated at a single board. It’s you Goons who have betrayed yourselves. It’s you Goons who hate yourselves and who evidence that hate on a daily basis.
I wish good fortune on Anonymous and I wish good fortune on you, Grandpop. You and Anonymous do not wish good fortune on me.
Why?
Because I have the peer-reviewed research in this field backing me and you do not. So it doesn’t bother me that there are people who do not agree with me on how to invest in stocks. While it bothers you a great deal that there are people who do not agree with you.
My aim is to change that. My aim is to help you feel the peace that I feel.
But I cannot pull it off without your cooperation, can I?
When you are ready to let go of the hate, I am here for you, man. I cannot force it no matter how much I care.
My best and warmest wishes to you and yours.
Rob
You have seen the facts.
For me, I have failed over and over again.
I understand, Anonymous.
Hang in there, man.
It gets better. A LOT better.
Rob
“I wish good fortune on Anonymous and I wish good fortune on you, Grandpop.”
Really? You are hoping for people to go to prison and for stock to drop 65%. That sounds like someone that is bitter and angry and wants revenge.
The sooner we open the internet up to honest posting on SWRs and many other topics, the shorter your prison sentence will be. Nobody has been pushing for that harder than me.
And there will not be a 65 percent drop if we open the internet to honest posting on the last 33 years of peer-reviewed research. If we permitted people to learn what the research says, the P/E10 level could never drop below 15 again. That’s a significant drop from where we are today. But it is a drop of a good bit less than 65 percent.
And of course we wouldn’t be seeing any drop at all if we had stabilized at 15 back in 2009, as we would have had we opened the internet up to honest posting back then. The economic crisis would be over now had we done that.
It’s the Buy-and-Hold Lies that are killing us. Learning what the peer-reviwed research shows is good stuff piled on top of good stuff piled on top of good stuff.
I am not bitter and angry and seeking revenge. I am excited and loving and seeking greater prosperity for all.
What a meanie I am to want to share with people what they need to know to reduce investing risk by 70 percent!
How could anyone BE so mean?
Rob
and for stock to drop 65%.
Think about what you are saying, man.
Say we were talking about a car you wanted to buy.
Would you be having nightmares about the possibility that its price might drop by two-thirds?
Lower prices on things you plan to buy are a good thing.
The only reason you view lower prices for stocks as a bad thing is that you are counting on the Pretend Gains to finance your retirement. That’s not on me. That’s on the other guy. I have been telling you since May 13, 2002, not to count on the Pretend Gains.
Outside of the popping of the Buy-and-Hold Fantasy, lower prices for stocks help all of us.
Rob
For people with differences to live together in harmony, there has to be a mutual respect for the other guy’s position.
Right, and when that respect is broken, the offender needs to be taken out of society. In real life, this might mean jail time, or not being invited back to a social gathering.
On the internet, these trolls can just be banned. Problem solved.
Except that you cannot ban the Reality Principle, as reflected in the peer-reviewed research.
And the longer you try, the more it eats you up inside.
Rob
“We ALL agreed to follow the published rules of the boards and blogs at which we post.”
I didn’t.
(And where are YOUR rules, for posting here?)
Read the rules of all of our boards and blogs. Those are my rules.
Read the laws of the United States of America. Those are my rules.
Read the history of civilized peoples. Those are my rules.
You say that you never agreed to those rules. I say you did.
Otherwise, why would you be so filled with self-hate?
You don’t hate me, Grandpop. That’s a pose. You hate yourself. I hold up a mirror to you and you see the thing you hate, that’s all. If you never cared about what the peer-reviewed research says, nothing that I say would bother you so much.
Rob