“If Death Threats Were Not a Way of Blocking Good Things From Happening, Death Threats Would Not Be Against the Law. If the People of the United States Did Not Need Protection From You, We Never Would Have Adopted Laws Protecting Us From You.”

Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:

“There are thousands of people who have expressed a desire that honest posting be permitted at every discussion board and blog on the internet. Those people don’t necessarily support Valuation-Informed Indexing. Most of them do not. They have an interest. They want to be able to ask questions. But as of now, they more Buy-and-Holders than they are Valuation-Informed Indexers.”

Okay, so you say you have this support. Explain specifically how you are kept from earning a living like Wade or Shiller. How is anyone blocking you from doing so?

I didn’t enact the laws against financial fraud, Anonymous. I think they are good and necessary laws. But the laws were there before I came on the scene.

I’m going to tell the story, that’s all. The millions of people whose lives you have destroyed will decide whether to bring civil or criminal actions.

If death threats were not a way of blocking good things from happening, death threats would not be against the law.

If the people of the United States did not need protection from you, we never would have adopted laws protecting us from you.

I will tell the story. And the people of the United States will decide what to do about what has been done to them. And that’s as it should be.

Rob