Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
“The entire purpose of my plan was to shift to a form of work that I would find more fulfilling and that would in the long run produce more income than the corporate employment that I left behind.”
No, your historical posts show you had only counted on a small amount of side income. You never had a substantial business income. To win anything, you would need to have suffered damages and quantify that. Secondly, even if you had a substantial business, the Statute if Limitations have long run out.
The crime is ongoing. Greaney’s study has not been corrected to this day. The bans remain in place. The abusive posting continues. Wade Pfau remains afraid to work with me to promote our research because of the threats you made.
I’ll quantify the damages. There are millions of investors. The Bennett/Pfau research shows them how to reduce risk by nearly 70 percent. Those millions of investors would obviously have been happy to have paid a large amount of money to reduce their risk by 70 percent. If only ten million paid me only $50 for me to show them how to reduce risk by 70 percent, that’s $500 million right there.
Rob


feed twitter twitter facebook