Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
To bad your book is not out yet, Rob so that you save us all right now from the Covid-19 crash.
It’s definitely too bad that the book is not out. We all need a clear and complete explanation of what is going on and what we all did (darn that Get Rich Quick/Buy-and-Hold impulse residing within all of us!) to get ourselves into this mess.
The other side of the story is that the book is only a few months away from completion. Can you imagine where we would be if I had not worked up the courage to advance my famous post from the morning of May 13, 2002? That’s what got the ball rolling. I could have cowered in fear and then we would not have that clear and complete explanation available to us even in a few months. So thank God for the voice that He put in my head to do the right thing re that one, you know?
Opening every discussion board and blog on the internet to honest posting re the last 39 years of peer-reviewed research, as I have been urging since the morning of May 13, 2002, would indeed have protected us all from the worst effects of the Covid-10 crash. We of course would have seen the terrifying threat to millions of lives in any event. And we of course would have seen some drop in our portfolios in any event, as our efforts to cope with the health threat required huge economic disruptions which obviously were going to cause a drop in stock prices. But the sort of price drop that is now on the table should never be on the table and never would be on the table in a world in which honest posting re Shiller’s Nobel-prize-winning research were permitted.
The thing that we call a stock market is not even truly a market — not today. In a true market, prices change as the result of the input of various information bits. We have lots and lots and lots of Get Rich Quick/Buy-and-Hold information bits being pumped into the brains of all market participants on a daily basis. But consideration of research-based information bits is prohibited. So, when a bad economic development like this takes place, we don’t see a drop in the CAPE value from 16 to 13 but perhaps a drop in the CAPE value from 30 to 8. We have made things a lot worse than than they needed to be. And we had to on numerous occasions travel outside the confines of U.S. law to pull it off. Not good.
I think we will make it. I think that we are a good people and that we are going to make it successfully to the other side of The Big Black Mountain. I am scared. I have been scared for a long time of what the last 39 years of peer-reviewed research told us was inevitably coming. Now that it appears that it may really be here, I am even more scared. But I remain hopeful that we will pull together as a nation and get the word that millions of investors need to hear out to them, as we should have begun doing on the morning of May 13, 2002 (or even better yet, back in 1981, when the Nobel-prize-winning research that showed us for the first time in history how stock investing works in the real world was published).
Wish us all luck, Anonymous! I naturally wish you all the best that this life has to offer a person.
Frightened But Hopeful Rob


“It’s definitely too bad that the book is not out. We all need a clear and complete explanation of what is going on and what we all did (darn that Get Rich Quick/Buy-and-Hold impulse residing within all of us!) to get ourselves into this mess.”
So you book will include all of your expert financial advice as to what we should invest in, correct?
The book will advocate market timing/price discipline, that’s for sure. That’s the one that I believe the Buy-and-Holders got wrong. All the rest of Valuation-Informed Indexing is just the standard Buy-and-Hold line. But now that we have 39 years of peer-reviewed research showing that market timing/price discipline is always 100 percent required, I definitely believe that we should be telling people that. So I do that.
Take Buy-and-Hold and incorporate the last 39 years of peer-reviewed research in this field and you have Valuation-Informed Indexing. The great irony is that it was from the Buy-and-Holders that I picked up the idea that investors should use the peer-reviewed research as a guide to how to invest in stocks. All that I am doing today is what the Buy-and-Holders said they believed in back in the early days of Buy-and-Hold. The Buy-and-Holders didn’t advocate a prohibition on discussion of the peer-reviewed research in the early days and I don’t advocate such a prohibition today.
Part of the scientific process is that we all get to learn new things over time. I see that as a good thing. And I think that it would be fair to say that once upon a time the Buy-and-Holders did too.
Up-to-Date Buy-and-Holder Rob