Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
“It’s a good thing to point out an error in retirement study. “
We just established that Greaney is irrelevant. So his 20 year old study is even more irrelevant. You replied that the real problem is his behavior (although any “behavior” in regards to you ended many years ago, so that is also irrelevant.) Now you’ve jumped right back to his irrelevant study.
This insane merry-go-round has been spinning for 20 years and gotten you nowhere, leaving your real life an utter train wreck. How many more years before you finally step off the carousel? The apparent answer is “all of them”.
I’m out. Good luck, Rob.
I naturally wish you all the best that this life has to offer a person, Miasma, regardless of what investment strategy you elect to follow.
Rob
Goonie, goonie, goonie………………..
Greaney, Greaney, Greaney……………..
Repeat, repeat, repeat…………”..
Yyyyyyyyyyyaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwnnnnnnnnn
I do what I can to guide us all to the place where deep in our heart we all want to be, Anonymous. We all need to know how stock investing works in the real world. That’s a universal. If we all truly believed that the peer-reviewed reserch was all a big yawn, we would not have have peer-reviewed journals in which to publish the new research. So I think we care. And I think we will all make it together to the other side and live better lives from that point forward.
We’ll see.
Rob