Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
“You don’t seem to have grown tired of being broke and cut off from investment community.”
Of course I’m tired of it.
What’s the alternative? To sell out my friends again? Thanks but no thanks, you know?
Rob


“ What’s the alternative?”
The alternative is to act normal and get a job. Hocomania has not worked out for you.
Um….
Rob
That’s what normal adults do, Rob.
Normal adults learn from new research in all fields of human endeavor outside of the investment advice field. The thing that attracted me to Buy-and-Hold in the days when I was a Buy-and-Holder is that it was marketed as a research-based strategy. That’s what I’m looking for.
My best wishes, etc.
Rob
Your opinions are not research. Further, what research told you to quit your job?
Noting the reactions of the Buy-and-Holders to my post of May 13, 2002, pointing out that the retirement study posted at John Greaney’s web site lacks a valuation adjustment is a form of research, Anonymous. If Buy-and-Hold/Get Rich Quick was a real thing, we never would have seen a single abusive post, much less any of the criminal stuff. The reactions have been intensely EMOTIONAL.
We can’t have the threads of our discussions published in a peer-reviewed journal. But that ocean of intense emotion that we have seen flood all of our boards and blogs over the first 21 years of The Great Safe Withdrawal Rate Debate certainly supports the findings of the Nobel-prize-winning research of Robert Shiller, which WAS published in one of them there peer-reviewed journals.
My sincere take.
Rob