Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
I look at outcomes. You are busy trying to deflect your failures through word salad.
Okay, Anonymous.
Research looks at historical outcomes. The difference is that research looks at all outcomes, not just those in the present day or the recent past.
Rob


– You lose all your money
– You lose your house
– Your wife leaves you
– Boards ban you
– No one in the investment community will talk to you
– You can even give it a break on Christmas Day, continuing to spew your hocomania
All of this, and you still don’t see how you are the problem
The problem is irrational exuberance, Anonymous. The thought behind the claim that market tming is not needed was that investors are 100 percent rational and therefore there’s no need to be concerned that emotion will ever take prices to crazy places. The reality is that irrational exuberance has always been a problem and the promotion of Buy-and-Hold strategies has made it worse.
The CAPE value tells the story. Today’s CAPE is a notch below the one that brought on the Great Depression. If we permitted discussion of the research, we could never see a CAPE value that high. We shouldn’t be suppressing discussion of the peer-reviewed research, we should be encouraging it.
That’s where I’m coming from re this one.
Rob
Irrational exuberance cause you to quit your job? Irrational exuberance caused your wife to walk out the door? Irrational exuberance twisted your brain enough to make you post on Christmas Day? Of course not. You cannot take responsibility for anything in your life and you put all the blame on everyone else but you.
The only one responsible for Rob Bennett is Rob Bennett. End of story.
Irrationl exuberance caused John Greaney to come to believe that it might be okay to fail to include a valuation adjustment in his retirement study and it caused a good number of Buy-and-Holders to go along with his decision not to correct the study when the error was brought to his attention. I did nothing wrong in pointing out the error. It was the freak-out among you Goons that was the problem, not my decision to point out the error.
You can’t have both a research-based strategy and a pure Get Rich Quick strategy. You need to choose.
Rob
If you don’t like Greaney’s study, do you own. If you don’t like the fact that Shiller and Pfau won’t put VII in their books, then write your own. If you don’t like your wife nagging you to get a job, get a new wife. If you don’t like the content on other people’s boards, run your own board and moderate the content yourself.
Don’t go expecting everyone else to do your work. Don’t expect everyone else to believe your crap about what you think the research says. Don’t expect everyone to believe your made up lies about criminal acts.
No one has to lift one single finger for you.
There were people who believed that the study was real, Anonymous. I know. I was there.
Do you think it would have been better if I had kept it zipped?
Rob
Keep it zipped??? Didn’t you read? I said you should do all things yourself. We aren’t your servants.
Okay, Anonymous.
I do wish you all good things, in any event.
Rob
Everyone you mention in your posts all do something. Wade Pfau, Shiller, Greaney, your ex-wife, your priest, etc. They all have jobs, or write books, etc. You are the only one that hasn’t done anything in the last 20+ years. Instead, you just sit around making posts about what other people should be doing and then you expect people to give you money for not doing anything. In short, you want welfare payments from the investment community.
I pointed out the error in the Greaney retirement study in my famous post from the morning of May 13, 2002, That ain’t nothing. That’s pretty darn big freakin’ deal. Many people invest in stocks with the hope of securing their retirement. So getting the numbers right in retirement studies is a big deal. It’s basic to the investment advice project. A model for understanding how stock investing works that causes people to post retirement studies that get the numbers wildy wrong is a gravely flawed model.
My sincere take.
Rob
“ I pointed out the error in the Greaney retirement study in my famous post from the morning of May 13, 2002, That ain’t nothing.”
Giving an opinion is nothing. We all give hundreds of opinions every week. Further, you lack the education and credentials to be giving out any kind of investment advice. Anyone that would have been stupid enough to listen to you would be in a very bad financial position today. Just look at your situation. It is a train wreck.
If the study had been corrected on the afternoon of May 13, 2002, as I proposed at the time, we all would be living better lives today. I have been 100 percent consistent in opposing the abusive intimidation stuff.
That’s where I’m coming from, Anonymous.
Rob
You have been living in your own fantasy world for well over 2 decades. You are a legend in your own mind. No one is interested in participating in your lunacy. In fact, you wife (now ex-wife) gave up on you as well. It appears you will spend your remaining years in poverty and alone and will only have yourself to blame.
Bummer, man!
Rob