Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
“ I believe that it may get some traction in the days and years following the onset of the next Buy-and-Hold Crisis. That would be super, That is what I hope will happen.”
It is your hope, just like everything you have placed hope in. It hasn’t gotten any real traction in well over 20 years. At some point, hope gives way to facing reality. It is long past the time for you to look at reality based not only on the passing of over 2 decades, but given your age, you have minimal choices to at least salvage something for whatever meager retirement fund you might be able to scrap together. You even destroyed your earnings history for social security benefits, so I can’t think of how you could be in any worse situation.
It has gotten TONS of traction. Not enough to overcome you Goons, that much is so. But enough to show that, had it not been for the abusive behavior of you Goons, Valuation-Informed Indexing would have taken over the world a long time ago. Had it not been for the abusive behavior of you Goons, Valuation-Informed Indexing would today be the dominant model for understanding how stock investing works. It would have supplanted Buy-and-Hold. That ain’t nothing!
I have seen some amazing things happen. John Walter Russell was the most respected numbers guy in the Retire Early community. He devoted eight years of his life to researching my ideas without receiving a penny of compensation. Wade Pfau came to me and asked if it would be okay if he published peer-reviewed research on the Valuation-Informed Indexing concept. Then he concluded that it checked out completely. He was so excited by what he found that he was talking about receiving a Nobel prize for his work. We have seen THOUSANDS of our fellow community members express a desire that honest posting re the research he permitted. That’s traction.
The only hold-up has been the abusiveness and the criminal behavior of you Goons. And that abusiveness actually tells the same story, just in a different way. If you Goons hadn’t seen how much interest there is in the Valuation-Informed Indexing concept, you would have no problem with it. You wouldn’t just say: “So what? Let people invest how they want to invest.” The fact that you see it as such a threat shows that you appreciate that there are MILLIONS of investors who would like to learn what the research really says. Your behavior is a back-handed compliment but it’s a compliment all the same.
Or so I sincerely believe, in any event.
Rob


Zero traction, Rob. JWR was not what you say. Wade Pfau has recently said how poorly market timing worked out. You are broke and divorced. Other than you going to jail, I can’t think of how things couldn’t have turned out any worse for you. Instead of facing reality, you keep peddling the same stories and lies.
I believe to this day that the Greaney study lacks a valuation adjustment, Anonymous. That’s where I’m coming from re this one.
My best wishes to you.
Rob
You are a case study for what not to do.
Okay, Anonymous.
Rob
I have $1.2 million+ at the age 40 despite making much less than you did, not even accounting for inflation. Because I was smart in my 20s I’m able to spread my money around to help others while the nest egg compounds. I’ll be as rich as Anonymous by the time I’m around the age of you and him. Why should I follow your advice? Your method failed you. You failed.
Not according to the peer-reviewed research, Anonymous. The research that I co-authored with Wade Pfau shows that any investor who adds valuation-based market timing to his stock-buying process thereby permits himself to retire a good number of years sooner while also investing at greatly diminished risk. Whatever you have, you would end up with more over the course of an investing life time if you switched to a research-based strategy.
Following a research-based strategy can never hurt, it can only help.
You don’t subtract for irrational exuberance at all. Huh? What the f? Do you believe that irrational exuberance gains are real gains? You act like you do.
Rob
How does peer reviewed research show that your $0 is more than what anyone else has? Did you not take basic math? Anything times zero is still zero.
That comment is emotion-based. The research shows that all investors need to practice valuation-based market timing to keep irrational exuberance from getting out of control, like it is today.
Rob