Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
You start off with a false premise. Honest posting has not been banned and you haven’t been willing to discuss what the research really says.
If you don’t think that Shiller’s research shows that valuations affect long-term returns, what do you think it shows?
Ro


Let’s just look at long term results. Look at anyone that is now in their 60’s and entering retirement. Those that followed buy and hold for the last 40 years have done substantially better versus anyone following your VII strategy. We can all look at the numbers. You are broke. Fix your own problems instead of trying to drag everyone else down with you.
All of the numbers you talk about are not adjusted for irrational exuberance. If you make the adjustment, Valuation-Informed Indexing has been doing better than Buy-and-Hold for 150 years now. If you fail to make the adjustment, Buy-and-Hold has been doing better for the length of the current bull market. It’s hardly a surprise that a Get Rich Quick approach would look good at a time when the CAPE is 35. The more irrational investors are, the better Buy-and-Hold looks to them.
It all comes down to whether Shiller’s Nobel-prize-winning research is legitimate research. I believe that it is legitimate research. So that’s what I say I believe when the topic of safe withdrawal rates turns up in discussions held on the internet. There’s never going to be research supporting Buy-and-Hold and taking the research into consideration is never going to be popular at a time when the CAPE is 35.
Rob
Adjusting for irrational exuberance doesn’t pay the bills.
Only real dollars does that.
These are long term results, Rob. They show what has happened with all markets (up, down, stagnant, etc.).
This is comparing actual RESULTS.
We disagree, Evidence.
I say that following the research pays the bills better than giving in to your Get Rich Quick impulse. The purpose of research is to steer you away from the Get Rich Quick/Buy-and-Hold impulse.
Rob
What matters more: your interpretation of what other people say, or long term outcomes?
This is comparing actual RESULTS.
Shiller’s research and the Bennett/Pfau research looks at results. The reason why you are so hostile to the discussion of the research is that it does not support Get Rich Quick/Buy-and-Hold strategies. The only results that you are willing to take into consideration are results achieved during out-of-control bull markets.
You treat irrational exuberance as equivalent to real gains. The research shows that the two are not at all the same.
Rob
Pfau admitted last year that market timing failed.
What matters more: your interpretation of what other people say, or long term outcomes?
Most investors are not thinking clearly at a time when the CAPE is 35. If they were thinking clearly, the CAPE wouldn’t be 35.
For the market to function properly, we need to permit both those who follow Get Rich Quick.Buy-and-Hold strategies and those who prefer research-based strategies. Hearing about what the research says can help those who have given in to their Get Rich Quick/Buy-and-Hold strategies to rein in their worst inclinations. The more we permit honest posting re the research, the closer the CAPE value will get to its fair-price level.
Rob
Pfau admitted last year that market timing failed.
Only after he was threatened. In the days when he thought it was possible to do honest work n this field, he told a very, very different story. He told me after 16 months of intense research that: “Yes, Virginia, Valuation-Informed Indexing works!” If you thought that Buy-and-Hold could stand up to scrutiny, you would not engage in extortion in “defense” of it.
I mean, come on.
Rob