Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
You said suppression. Now you say disrupt. To you, disagreeing is disruption. Or when we point out the failure in your predictions is also disruption. Or when we push back on you calling Jack Bogle a conman as being disruption. Or when we tell you that is was a mistake to quit your job when you only had $400k in savings…..that is disruption as well.
How about death threats? Is that disruption?
How about demands for unjustified board bannings?
How about acts of extortion aimed at intimidation of academic researchers?
I pointed out the error in the Greaney retirement study on the morning of May 13, 2002 (it lacks a valuation adjustment). It hasn’t been corrected to this day, Please explain.
Rob
The only death threat came from you. You ban people and their posts, just like everyone else can. They don’t have to tolerate your crap. There was no intimidation, except by you. Wade Pfau even told you that you were the one causing significant damage to him, yet you ignored his comments. As for Greaney, you have been told thousands of times that no adjustment was needed and, as such, there is no error. Even you admitted that you were wrong about Greaney, but now you try and change history to cover up your complete failure.
Yeah, yeah.
Rob
Perhaps this is a topic best discussed with your therapist.
I’m not the one who permitted the CAPE value to rise to 37, Anonymous. That was the Buy-and-Holders.
That number suggests that it is today’s stock market that needs a therapist. I believe that the best possible therapy for a stock market that has produced a CAPE value of 37 is open discussion of the last 44 years of peer-reviewed research in this field.
Rob