|
Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the Goon Central board:
>
if he would try to claim in court that his internet business was ruined he would likely be asked why he was the most prolific poster at the website he is claiming harmed him.
>
What you are saying here would be so if it were ONLY the Goons who were doing me harm, Ataloss. That’s what I thought the situation was when I sent my first e-mail to Motley Fool about the Greaney problem.I learned something when that e-mail didn’t get the job done. And of course I learned more when my good friend Jack Bogle didn’t respond to my four e-mails to him re the Lindauer matter.It ain’t just the Goons who are a problem here. Not by a long shot. I don’t say anymore that it is only the Goons.
This is a society-wide problem. Dab brings up a telling point when he says that, when he goes on Google to find the value of his portfolio, they tell only the nominal number. You can find the P/E10 value on Google. They give you what you need to figure out the real numbers. But they don’t assemble them for you. And they should. Why don’t they? Shiller’s advance was HUGE. His word was “revolutionary.” That ain’t hype. The move from Buy-and-Hold to Valuation-Informed Indexing is the biggest advance in the history of investing analysis. By a factor of 10. Reducing the risk of stock investing by 70 percent is no small thing. We need to rewrite all the textbooks. Experts are people who spend a lot of time in school. The more time you spent in investing school, the more you believe in Buy-and-Hold because that is what is taught there. So we are in a situation where the experts are the people least able to see the straight story. It’s a mess. Now — We’re not going to put everyone in jail who doesn’t understand this stuff. That’s 90 percent of the freakin’ population! You don’t put 90 percent of the population in jail. It’s not a practical idea. But this is the greatest act of financial fraud in U.S. history. So there obviously need to be prison sentences. So what the heck do we do? We bring out our old friend Cognitive Dissonance. Cognitive Dissonance is real. It is written up in the psychological literature. It explains what we have seen. Jack Bogle is a great man, a good man and a smart man and a hard-working man and a pioneer in an important field. He is also a human. This is bigger than him. He had no idea that this Shiller stuff was so important. He believes in Buy-and-Hold on at least one level of consciousness and so he had to tell himself things to persuade himself to keep doing that when he was faced with evidence that the Shiller stuff is right. Millions of people did similar things. All of those people are going to be left off the hook. They messed up. Humans mess up from time to time. They also did lots of good things. Case closed. That’s true with the Goons too. Greaney and Lindauer believe in this stuff on some level of consciousness. So in an ideal world they would be off the hook too. But we have a problem. You can’t use cognitive dissonance as an excuse for putting forward death threats and tens of thousands of acts of defamation and threats to get academic researchers fired from their jobs. Permit that and you might as well take all the laws off the books. There’s an additional dimension to this for you Goons because you were tricked into believing that these nasty internet tricks that low-lifes use to deal with “trolls” are not in the most extreme cases violations of law. We haven’t had people go to jail for this sort of thing yet because the internet is a new communications medium. But all the elements of crimes are there and recorded in Post Archives. That’s why you Goons cannot back down now. Fail to back down, you go to prison. Back down, you go to prison. So your attitude is: In for a dime, in for a dollar and hope for the best. I get it. Loud and clear. There’s not anything that I can think of that I can do to help out. I obviously want to bring the economic crisis to an end. That’s job #1. But if I lie and say that I don’t think you’ll go to jail, you don’t believe me. And, if I tell the truth and say you’re going to jail, you are too afraid to come clean. My thought is that the best thing to do is to focus on the positive side of the story, which is huge. The positive is so big that I believe that we can get lots of people to let the bad stuff go. But can we get enough people to let the bad stuff go to keep you out of prison? Before the Wade Pfau thing, I thought there was a small chance that we could pull that off. I no longer believe that. I feel obligated to tell you what I believe re this matter because going to prison is a very big deal and I do think of you as friends whatever you say about it. So, following the Wade Pfau thing, I started mentioning this point with the hope that we could at least keep the prison sentences as limited as they possibly can be at this point. It does nothing for me to see my friends go to prison. I am not going to say that I believe this can be avoided at this point because I personally do not believe it can be avoided. But there has of course never been a situation quite like this one before. So no one knows anything with certainty. The reason I post here is that Job #1 is to bring the economic crisis to an end. None of us make it to the other side if we don’t figure out a way to pull together and make that one happen. The fear you Goons have of going to prison is part of the reason why we cannot pull together. So I have a responsibility to come here and do what I can do. If you Goons didn’t matter, I wouldn’t be here. Bogle’s unwillingness to deal with the Lindauer matter gives you Goons a power to do yourselves and others harm that otherwise you would not possess. If Bogle does his part, I am out of here. If Bogle does his part, this place no longer exists. I have ASKED Bogle to do his part on numerous occasions. I am clean re this aspect of the question, Ataloss. Rob |
“You Can’t Use Cognitive Dissonance As an Excuse for Putting Forward Death Threats and Tens of Thousands of Acts of Defamation and Threats to Get Academic Researchers Fired From Their Jobs. That’s Why You Goons Cannot Back Down Now.”
Set forth below are the words of a comment that I recently put to the Goon Central board:
|
if he would try to claim in court that his internet business was ruined he would likely be asked why he was the most prolific poster at the website he is claiming harmed him.
What you are saying here would be so if it were ONLY the Goons who were doing me harm, Ataloss. That’s what I thought the situation was when I sent my first e-mail to Motley Fool about the Greaney problem. I learned something when that e-mail didn’t get the job done. And of course I learned more when my good friend Jack Bogle didn’t respond to my four e-mails to him re the Lindauer matter. It ain’t just the Goons who are a problem here. Not by a long shot. I don’t say anymore that it is only the Goons. This is a society-wide problem. Dab brings up a telling point when he says that, when he goes on Google to find the value of his portfolio, they tell only the nominal number. You can find the P/E10 value on Google. They give you what you need to figure out the real numbers. But they don’t assemble them for you. And they should. Why don’t they? Shiller’s advance was HUGE. His word was “revolutionary.” That ain’t hype. The move from Buy-and-Hold to Valuation-Informed Indexing is the biggest advance in the history of investing analysis. By a factor of 10. Reducing the risk of stock investing by 70 percent is no small thing. We need to rewrite all the textbooks. Experts are people who spend a lot of time in school. The more time you spent in investing school, the more you believe in Buy-and-Hold because that is what is taught there. So we are in a situation where the experts are the people least able to see the straight story. It’s a mess. Now — We’re not going to put everyone in jail who doesn’t understand this stuff. That’s 90 percent of the freakin’ population! You don’t put 90 percent of the population in jail. It’s not a practical idea. But this is the greatest act of financial fraud in U.S. history. So there obviously need to be prison sentences. So what the heck do we do? We bring out our old friend Cognitive Dissonance. Cognitive Dissonance is real. It is written up in the psychological literature. It explains what we have seen. Jack Bogle is a great man, a good man and a smart man and a hard-working man and a pioneer in an important field. He is also a human. This is bigger than him. He had no idea that this Shiller stuff was so important. He believes in Buy-and-Hold on at least one level of consciousness and so he had to tell himself things to persuade himself to keep doing that when he was faced with evidence that the Shiller stuff is right. Millions of people did similar things. All of those people are going to be left off the hook. They messed up. Humans mess up from time to time. They also did lots of good things. Case closed. That’s true with the Goons too. Greaney and Lindauer believe in this stuff on some level of consciousness. So in an ideal world they would be off the hook too. But we have a problem. You can’t use cognitive dissonance as an excuse for putting forward death threats and tens of thousands of acts of defamation and threats to get academic researchers fired from their jobs. Permit that and you might as well take all the laws off the books. There’s an additional dimension to this for you Goons because you were tricked into believing that these nasty internet tricks that low-lifes use to deal with “trolls” are not in the most extreme cases violations of law. We haven’t had people go to jail for this sort of thing yet because the internet is a new communications medium. But all the elements of crimes are there and recorded in Post Archives. That’s why you Goons cannot back down now. Fail to back down, you go to prison. Back down, you go to prison. So your attitude is: In for a dime, in for a dollar and hope for the best. I get it. Loud and clear. There’s not anything that I can think of that I can do to help out. I obviously want to bring the economic crisis to an end. That’s job #1. But if I lie and say that I don’t think you’ll go to jail, you don’t believe me. And, if I tell the truth and say you’re going to jail, you are too afraid to come clean. My thought is that the best thing to do is to focus on the positive side of the story, which is huge. The positive is so big that I believe that we can get lots of people to let the bad stuff go. But can we get enough people to let the bad stuff go to keep you out of prison? Before the Wade Pfau thing, I thought there was a small chance that we could pull that off. I no longer believe that. I feel obligated to tell you what I believe re this matter because going to prison is a very big deal and I do think of you as friends whatever you say about it. So, following the Wade Pfau thing, I started mentioning this point with the hope that we could at least keep the prison sentences as limited as they possibly can be at this point. It does nothing for me to see my friends go to prison. I am not going to say that I believe this can be avoided at this point because I personally do not believe it can be avoided. But there has of course never been a situation quite like this one before. So no one knows anything with certainty. The reason I post here is that Job #1 is to bring the economic crisis to an end. None of us make it to the other side if we don’t figure out a way to pull together and make that one happen. The fear you Goons have of going to prison is part of the reason why we cannot pull together. So I have a responsibility to come here and do what I can do. If you Goons didn’t matter, I wouldn’t be here. Bogle’s unwillingness to deal with the Lindauer matter gives you Goons a power to do yourselves and others harm that otherwise you would not possess. If Bogle does his part, I am out of here. If Bogle does his part, this place no longer exists. I have ASKED Bogle to do his part on numerous occasions. I am clean re this aspect of the question, Ataloss. Rob |
ITNR #91 — It’s Not a Buy-and-Hold Conspiracy, It’s Cognitive Dissonance
I’ve posted Entry #91 to my weekly Investing: The New Rules column at the Death by 1,000 Papercuts site. It’s called It’s Not a Buy-and-Hold Conspiracy, It’s Cognitive Dissonance.
Juicy Excerpt: The number who believe that the case for Buy-and-Hold is rock solid is just about zero. If there were Buy-and-Hold advocates who were confident in what they say, they would be engaging in spirited debates with people like me, trying to help people come to an ever deeper understanding of the case. It’s a rare event to come across a Buy-and-Holder willing to engage in a civil discussion of what the academic research says. I think it would be fair to say that not one Buy-and-Holder in ten possesses a strong confidence in the strategies he advocates.
It doesn’t follow that most Buy-and-Holders do not believe at all. I have studied this matter in great depth and my strong sense is that the vast majority of Buy-and-Holders believe to the extent necessary to invest their own money pursuant to the tenets of Buy-and-Hold.
ITNR #64 — Voters Don’t Know What They Want, and Neither Do Investors
I’ve posted Entry #64 to my weekly Investing: The New Rules column at the Death by 1,000 Papercuts site. It’s called Voters Don’t Know What They Want, and Neither Do Investors.
Juicy Excerpt: There’s a fundamental flaw in the way we think about politics (I learned about it from studying investing and I am going to tie it to that subject in just a bit). The flaw is the assumption of rationality inherent in our system.
We decide things through votes. There’s a rarely voiced assumption inherent in a decision to do that. The assumption is that people are capable of knowing their own interests and of pursuing them by voting in support of them. But what if most or all humans are simply not capable of knowing their self interest? Wouldn’t that throw a monkey wrench into the machinery?
Most people are not capable of understanding what is in their self interest. The human is the rationalizing animal. We kid ourselves. We possess the intellectual ability to discern reality. But we often choose not to accept it. We live in fantasy worlds. Not only when it comes to our dating lives. We do this when we decide who to vote for. And we do this when we decide how to invest our retirement money.
ITNR #36 — Fear of Data
I’ve posted Entry #36 to my weekly Investing: The New Rules column at the Death by 1,000 Papercuts site. It’s called Fear of Data.
Juicy Excerpt: In any other field, this would be the end of the controversy. The safe withdrawal rate is the product of a numerical calculation. When peer-reviewed research shows that the numbers now in use are in error, the studies generating those numbers need to be corrected. No? That’s sure how I have seen things work in all fields other than stock investing analysis. It doesn’t work that way in this field. Terms like “data” and “research” and “science” are given very different meanings when the topic at hand relates to stock investing.
“The Problem Here Is Cognitive Dissonance, Not Bad Motive”
Set forth below is the text of my response to the comment put forward by Mark that was detailed in yesterday’s blog entry:
It’s my belief that we are ALL on the same side, Marc. I include the Buy-and-Holders in that. I include John Bogle in that. I include the Fed in that.
Your description of “the Fed dangled poison in front of us, Wall Street told us it was “mmm good,” and we lapped it up without reading the bottle” is close to being perfect. It’s lacking only one element, in my assessment. The element lacking is a discussion of MOTIVE. This stuff is not hard. We have lots of smart people in the finance industry and in the Fed and among our political leaders. Why didn’t anyone DO anything before things reached this point?
You hint at the best answer to this one when you note that you yourself didn’t see that the emperor was wearing no clothes until after 2000. Why didn’t you see then what it is so easy for you to see now?
Humans are flawed creatures. We are given to self-deception. When we want to believe something, we believe it, no matter how big the mountain of evidence is telling us we are wrong.
This is exciting news. It doesn’t sound exciting at first because it sounds depressing to think that humans can be so easily and so totally fooled. But, if you think it through a bit, I think you will come to appreciate that we have some truly amazing possibilities that will be opening up to us in coming days.
What this tells us is that there is not bad motive here. Not on the part of the Fed. Not on the part of the Stock Selling Industry. Obviously not on the part of investors. The root problem here is cognitive dissonance, not bad motive. That means that all this can change on a dime.
It goes to your Easter Bunny scenario. I do NOT think that it is believing in the Easter Bunny to believe that we can turn this around. All of the people who today endorse Buy-and-Hold WANT to invest effectively. We have available to us today a powerful communications medium (the internet) to let the entire globe know what really works as soon as people reach a point where they are able to take it in. We can change the history of stock investing overnight.
People are not dumb. People are not bad. People are CONFUSED. We today have research that did not exist in earlier economic crises that can be used to help dispel that confusion. When people learn the realities of stock investing, our entire economy is going to become more productive. Not by a little bit. There are going to be TRILLIONS of dollars being put to better uses than they have ever been put to before because in all earlier times people did not have available to them the research needed to know how to invest their money effectively.
We’re going to see another crash. That’s going to be the turning point. That is going to be the thing that breaks the resistance of those who today cannot accept that they made a mistake and have been investing ineffectively all these years. After the next crash, we will be able to discuss what works on every discussion board and on every blog on the internet. We are going to be able to get the word out to millions in no time at all. Investing will never be the same again.
We are talking about something akin to the invention of electricity. We are in the process of changing the rules of the game in a dramatic way. We are going to have the Fed working it hard on our side. We are going to have Bogle working it hard on our side. We are going to have all the newspapers and magazines and television shows working it hard on our side. There is not one person alive who does not want to know how to invest effectively. There is not one investing expert alive who does not want to give good advice to his or her clients or listeners or readers. We are going to have huge leverage working to rebuild the greatest economic system ever and to transform it into something far more productive and humane and LOVING than it has ever been before.
It’s always darkest before the dawn. This economic crisis was a dark and rocky patch of ground that we had to walk through to get to the promised land.
Or at least that’s my story — and I’m sticking to it! (I cannot bear to imagine the other possibility!)
Rob
Daily Caller Article #4 — Facts Don’t Matter
I’ve authored Article #4 for the Daily Caller site. It’s entitled Facts Don’t Matter.
Juicy Excerpt: We all need to let it in that a lot of our beliefs about current developments are more rooted in an effort to justify our preexisting biases than they are informed and objective assessments of reality. Conservatives and liberals have “explained” the economic crisis primarily by filtering developments through their biases about the ineffectiveness of government (when it comes to conservatives) and the greed of bankers (when it comes to liberals). There’s no conventional political point pressed by placing the primary blame where I think it belongs — on the overvalued stock market of the late 1990s and the loss of wealth that took place with its inevitable collapse. A positive way to spin the Boston Globe article is to see that there may be solutions to our problems that we do not yet recognize because we are too caught up in efforts to put new problems into old pigeonholes.
Podcast #73 — It’s Not a Conspiracy, It’s Cognitive Dissonance
I’ve posted Podcast #73 to the “RobCasts” section of the site. It’s called It’s Not a Conspiracy, It’s Cognitive Dissonance.
Cult members didn’t leave the cult when they discovered that the world did not come to an end on the day anticipated. They rejoiced in the belief that their belied persuaded the aliens that there was no need to destroy Planet Earth after all. And Passive Investors don’t blame their investing strategy when it once again fails to work in the real world.


feed twitter twitter facebook