Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site:
Can you buy groceries with your opinion of the peer reviewed research? How about that for different strokes.
I cannot buy groceries with it.
But I can sleep at night knowing that I did right by my fellow community members, some of whom had become friends over the years. That matters more than groceries to me. Call me madcap!
Rob


You haven’t helped any community members. In fact, anyone that followed your advice would have been in much worse financial shape as your advice has greatly lagged the market for the past 25+ years.
You’re not adjusting for the effect of irrational exuberance. You have made that same mistake in every comment you have advanced during the first 22 years of the discussions. That’s the mistake that Greaney made in his retirement study.
Rob
How do you adjust for the homelessness that Valuation-Informed Indexers have been known to suffer from?
That comment is pure emotion, Sensible.
Either irrational exuberance is a thing or it is not. If it is a thing, it’s something that we should be taking into consideration in every discussion about stock investing in which we participate.
There’s 43 years of peer-reviewed research showing that it is very much a thing.
Rob
So what you are saying is that you buy and holders might have to take a few less European vacations, or might have to do without our 3rd vacation property, or might not be able to trade in our S class Mercedes every year for the new model (resorting to every other year), while we wait for the market to recover like it always does. Oh, woe is me.
So what you are saying is that you buy and holders might have to take a few less European vacations, or might have to do without our 3rd vacation property, or might not be able to trade in our S class Mercedes every year for the new model (resorting to every other year), while we wait for the market to recover like it always does. Oh, woe is me.
I’m saying that, because the Greaney retirement study lacks a valuation adjustment, it gets the numbers wildly wrong. I’m saying that, if we had begun permitting honest posting re the peer-reviewed research on the afternoon of May 13, 2002, as I proposed at the time, we would today be 22 years ahead of where we are in our development of the Valuation-Informed Indexing concept.
Rob
You are broke. Who got the numbers wrong?
Greaney did.
That’s why he has behaved the way he has. If he truly believed that he had included a valuation adjustment in his retirement study, we never would have seen a single abusive post.
Rob